Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems. I. Nonlinear functional analysis approach

Cacuci, Dan G.·1981·Journal of Mathematical Physics

Abstract

Concepts of nonlinear functional analysis are employed to investigate the mathematical foundations underlying sensitivity theory. This makes it possible not only to ascertain the limitations inherent in existing analytical approaches to sensitivity analysis, but also to rigorously formulate a considerably more general sensitivity theory for physical problems characterized by systems of nonlinear equations and by nonlinear functionals as responses. Two alternative formalisms, labeled the ’’forward sensitivity formalism’’ and the ’’adjoint sensitivity formalism,’’ are developed in order to evaluate the sensitivity of the response to variations in the system parameters. The forward sensitivity formalism is formulated in normed linear spaces, and the existence of the Gâteaux differentials of the operators appearing in the problem is shown to be both necessary and sufficient for its validity. This formalism is conceptually straightforward and can be advantageously used to assess the effects of relatively few parameter alterations on many responses. On the other hand, for problems involving many parameter alterations or a large data base and comparatively few functional-type responses, the alternative adjoint sensitivity formalism is computationally more economical. However, it is shown that this formalism can be developed only under conditions that are more restrictive than those underlying the validity of the forward sensitivity formalism. In particular, the requirement that operators acting on the state vector and on the system parameters must admit densely defined Gâteaux derivatives is shown to be of fundamental importance for the validity of this formalism. The present analysis significantly extends the scope of sensitivity theory and provides a basis for still further generalizations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.525186

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Cacuci, D. G.
Venue
Journal of Mathematical Physics
Published
1981-12-01
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
2794-2802
ISSN
  • 0022-2488 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7658
OpenAlex
W2028741947
Cited by
388
References
0
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems. I. Nonlinear functional analysis approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.525186
The paper
Cacuci, D. G. (1981). Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems. I. Nonlinear functional analysis approach. Journal of Mathematical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.525186

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.