Cited by 46Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

How solvable is (2+1)-dimensional Einstein gravity?

Moncrief, Vincent·1990·Journal of Mathematical Physics

Abstract

In this paper, the relationship between Witten’s approach to the (2+1)-dimensional, vacuum Einstein equations (for spatially compact space-times) and the conventional Annowitt, Deser, and Misner (ADM) Hamiltonian approach is discussed. It is argued (especially for the space-times with higher genus Cauchy surfaces) that neither approach is complete in itself; Witten’s because it does not provide a technique (even at the classical level) for recovering the space-time metric and the conventional approach because it provides no mechanism for solving a seemingly intractable set of Hamilton equations. It is also argued, however, that the two formulations are instead complementary in the sense that the Wilson loops, which play a key role in Witten’s approach, provide (at least in principle) a mechanism for solving the reduced Hamilton equations and thereby completing the picture at the classical level. An example of this synthesis for the (explicitly computable) case of genus-one hypersurfaces is provided. The more tenuous problem of whether this synthesis can be extended to the quantized Einstein equations will also be discussed. A principal open question is whether the Wilson loops, when expressed in terms of the ADM canonical variables, can be ordered in such a way as to preserve, quantum mechanically, their (classical) Poisson bracket algebra.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.528950

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For spatial surfaces of genus g > 1, the complexity of the constraint makes reduced phase space quantization impractical.

    “For spatial surfaces of genus g > 1, the complexity of the constraint (32) seems to make this approach to quantization impractical [207].”
  • For higher genus spaces and realistic 3+1-dimensional gravity, such an isomorphism is not known.

    “For higher genus spaces, however — and certainly for realistic (3 + 1)-dimensional gravity — it is not [207].”
  • The relationship between ADM and Chern-Simons quantizations relied on a particularly simple operator ordering, and it is not obvious that such an ordering can be found for the higher genus case.

    “In particular, the relationship between the ADM and Chern-Simons quantizations in Section 3.4 relied on a particularly simple operator ordering; it is not obvious that such an ordering can be found for the higher genus case [207].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moncrief, V.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Moncrief, Vincent
Venue
Journal of Mathematical Physics
Published
1990-12-01
Volume
31
Issue
12
Pages
2978-2982
ISSN
  • 0022-2488 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7658
OpenAlex
W2023384735
Cited by
46
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
vacuum Einstein equations, Wilson loops, Poisson bracket algebra, quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review