Cited by 43Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory

A definition of the Ponzano–Regge quantum gravity model in terms of surfacesa)

Open access
Iwasaki, Junichi·1995·Journal of Mathematical Physics

Abstract

We show that the partition function of the Ponzano–Regge quantum gravity model can be written as a sum over surfaces in a (2+1)-dimensional space–time. We suggest a geometrical meaning, in terms of surfaces, for the (regulated) divergences that appear in the partition function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.531245

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 43

Authors
Iwasaki, J.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Iwasaki, Junichi
Venue
Journal of Mathematical Physics
Published
1995-11-01
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
6288-6298
ISSN
  • 0022-2488 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7658
OpenAlex
W1854704759
Cited by
43
References
10
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
Ponzano-Regge model, quantum gravity, partition function, surfaces, 2+1 dimensions, geometric interpretation, 3-manifolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review