Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 485

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Statistics of resonance poles, phase shifts and time delays in quantum chaotic scattering: Random matrix approach for systems with broken time-reversal invariance

Open access
Fyodorov, Yan V., Sommers, Hans-Jürgen·1997·Journal of Mathematical Physics

Abstract

Assuming the validity of random matrices for describing the statistics of a closed chaotic quantum system, we study analytically some statistical properties of the S-matrix characterizing scattering in its open counterpart. In the first part of the paper we attempt to expose systematically ideas underlying the so-called stochastic (Heidelberg) approach to chaotic quantum scattering. Then we concentrate on systems with broken time-reversal invariance coupled to continua via Mopen channels; a=1,2,…,M. A physical realization of this case corresponds to the chaotic scattering in ballistic microstructures pierced by a strong enough magnetic flux. By using the supersymmetry method we derive an explicit expression for the density of S-matrix poles (resonances) in the complex energy plane. When all scattering channels are considered to be equivalent our expression describes a crossover from the χ2 distribution of resonance widths (regime of isolated resonances) to a broad power-like distribution typical for the regime of overlapping resonances. The first moment is found to reproduce exactly the Moldauer–Simonius relation between the mean resonance width and the transmission coefficient. Under the same assumptions we derive an explicit expression for the parametric correlation function of densities of eigenphases θa of the S-matrix (taken modulo 2π). We use it to find the distribution of derivatives τa=∂θa/∂E of these eigenphases with respect to the energy (“partial delay times”) as well as with respect to an arbitrary external parameter. We also find the parametric correlations of the Wigner–Smith time delay τw(E)=(1/M)∑a ∂θa/∂E at two different energies E−Ω/2 and E+Ω/2 as well as at two different values of the external parameter. The relation between our results and those following from the semiclassical approach as well as the relevance to experiments are briefly discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.531919

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Cited by

See all 485

Metadata

Authors
Fyodorov, Y. V., & Sommers, H.-J.
Venue
Journal of Mathematical Physics
Published
1997-04-01
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
1918-1981
ISSN
  • 0022-2488 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7658
OpenAlex
W2034307084
Cited by
485
References
69
FWCI
26.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistics of resonance poles, phase shifts and time delays in quantum chaotic scattering: Random matrix approach for systems with broken time-reversal invariance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.531919
The paper
Fyodorov, Y. V., & Sommers, H.-J. (1997). Statistics of resonance poles, phase shifts and time delays in quantum chaotic scattering: Random matrix approach for systems with broken time-reversal invariance. Journal of Mathematical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.531919

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.