The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ=590
Abstract
Numerical simulations of fully developed turbulent channel flow at three Reynolds numbers up to Reτ=590 are reported. It is noted that the higher Reynolds number simulations exhibit fewer low Reynolds number effects than previous simulations at Reτ=180. A comprehensive set of statistics gathered from the simulations is available on the web at http://www.tam.uiuc.edu/Faculty/Moser/channel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number
Kim, J., Moin, P., & Moser, R. (1987) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112087000892 · Cited by 4,873
Self-citation
Cited by
Turbulent flame–wall interaction: a direct numerical simulation study
GRUBER, A., SANKARAN, R., HAWKES, E. R., & CHEN, J. H. (2010) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112010001278 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Moser, R. D., Kim, J., & Mansour, N. N.
- Venue
- Physics of Fluids
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 943-945
- ISSN
- 1070-6631 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7666
- OpenAlex
- W2564800775
- Cited by
- 2,682
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ=590. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.869966
- The paper
- Moser, R. D., Kim, J., & Mansour, N. N. (1999). Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ=590. Physics of Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.869966
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
