Foundations of Vacuum Science and Technology
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Under ideal operating conditions, the ion current in a hot-cathode ionization gauge is directly proportional to gas density and therefore pressure.
“Under ideal operating conditions, the ion current is directly proportional to gas density and therefore pressure.”
From Review Article: Recommended practice for calibrating vacuum gauges of the ionization type (2018) · cites this paper as [12]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fundamentals of Electric Propulsion: Ion and Hall Thrusters
Goebel, D. M., & Katz, I. (2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470436448 · Cited by 1,351 · see citing works
Numerical study of a hollow cathode neutraliser by means of a zero-dimensional plasma model
Gurciullo, A., Fabris, A. L., & Potterton, T. (2020) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.05.006 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Review Article: Recommended practice for calibrating vacuum gauges of the ionization type
Fedchak, J. A., Abbott, P. J., Hendricks, J. H., Arnold, P. C., & Peacock, N. T. (2018) · Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films · doi:10.1116/1.5025060 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Model Based Exploration of Physical Parameters for Liquid Hydrogen System Insulation Performance
Maynard, N., Louriou, C., & Estebe, B. (2024) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1301/1/012067 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lafferty, J. M., & Rubin, L. G.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Venue
- Physics Today
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1999-03-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 86-88
- ISSN
- 0031-9228
- 1945-0699
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
