The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ionic conductivity in Li3N single crystals
Abstract
Lithium ionic conductivity of Czochralski-grown Li3N single crystals using electrochemical transport measurements is reported. The highest Li ionic conductivity was found perpendicular to the hexagonal c axis, the anisotropy decreasing from two to one decade between 20 and 200 °C. Ambient Li ionic conductivity parallel to the Li2N planes of the layer structure was found to be σ=10−3 Ω−1 cm−1 with an activation energy of 0.25 eV. These values are comparable with the best data reported for Li β-alumina single crystals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Metadata
- Authors
- Alpen, U. V., Rabenau, A., & Talat, G. H.
- Venue
- Applied Physics Letters
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1977-06-15
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 621-623
- ISSN
- 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
- 1077-3118
- OpenAlex
- W2059481908
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ionic conductivity in Li3N single crystals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.89283
- The paper
- Alpen, U. V., Rabenau, A., & Talat, G. H. (1977). Ionic conductivity in Li3N single crystals. Applied Physics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.89283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
