The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increased optical damage resistance in lithium niobate
Abstract
We have confirmed greatly improved resistance to photorefractive damage in compositions of lithium niobate containing 4.5 at. % MgO or more. Holographic diffraction measurements of photorefraction demonstrated that the improved performance is due to a hundredfold increase in the photoconductivity, rather than a decrease in the Glass current. The diffraction efficiency shows an Arrhenius dependence on temperature, with an activation energy of 0.1 eV for the damage-resistant compositions, compared with 0.5 eV for undoped or low-magnesium compositions. The damage-resistant compositions are distinguished by a 2.83-μm absorption line instead of the usual 2.87-μm line due to the OH-stretch vibration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Micro- and nano-domain engineering in lithium niobate
Shur, V. Y., Akhmatkhanov, A. R., & Baturin, I. S. (2015) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.4928591 · Cited by 270
Mitigating photorefractive effect in thin-film lithium niobate microring resonators
Xu, Y., Shen, M., Lu, J., Surya, J. B., Sayem, A. A., & Tang, H. X. (2021) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.418877 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Bryan, D. A., Gerson, R., & Tomaschke, H. E.
- Venue
- Applied Physics Letters
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1984-05-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 847-849
- ISSN
- 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
- 1077-3118
- OpenAlex
- W2058242280
- Cited by
- 635
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased optical damage resistance in lithium niobate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.94946
- The paper
- Bryan, D. A., Gerson, R., & Tomaschke, H. E. (1984). Increased optical damage resistance in lithium niobate. Applied Physics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.94946
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
