Cited by 302Machine Learning in Materials ScienceComputational and Text Analysis MethodsAdvanced Text Analysis Techniques

Data-driven materials research enabled by natural language processing and information extraction

Open access
Olivetti, Elsa A., Cole, Jacqueline M., Kim, Edward, Kononova, Olga, Ceder, Gerbrand, Han, Thomas Yong-Jin, Hiszpanski, Anna M.·2020·Applied Physics Reviews

Abstract

Given the emergence of data science and machine learning throughout all aspects of society, but particularly in the scientific domain, there is increased importance placed on obtaining data. Data in materials science are particularly heterogeneous, based on the significant range in materials classes that are explored and the variety of materials properties that are of interest. This leads to data that range many orders of magnitude, and these data may manifest as numerical text or image-based information, which requires quantitative interpretation. The ability to automatically consume and codify the scientific literature across domains—enabled by techniques adapted from the field of natural language processing—therefore has immense potential to unlock and generate the rich datasets necessary for data science and machine learning. This review focuses on the progress and practices of natural language processing and text mining of materials science literature and highlights opportunities for extracting additional information beyond text contained in figures and tables in articles. We discuss and provide examples for several reasons for the pursuit of natural language processing for materials, including data compilation, hypothesis development, and understanding the trends within and across fields. Current and emerging natural language processing methods along with their applications to materials science are detailed. We, then, discuss natural language processing and data challenges within the materials science domain where future directions may prove valuable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/5.0021106

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 134 · Cited by 302

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. National Research Council, High Magnetic Field Science and Its Applications in the United States: Current Status and Future Direction (National Academies Press, 2013).
  2. Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee, Next-Generation Photon Sources for Grand Challenges in Science and Energy: Report of the Workshop on Solving Science and Energy Grand Challenges with Next-Generation Photon Sources (U.S. Department of Energy, 2009).
  3. D. M. Jessop, S. E. Adams, E. L. Willighagen, L. Hawizy, and P. Murray-Rust, "OSCAR4: A flexible architecture for chemical textmining," J. Cheminf. 3, 41 (2011).
  4. C. J. Court and J. M. Cole, "Auto-generated materials database of Curie and N eel temperatures via semisupervised relationship extraction," Sci. Data 5, 180111 (2018).
  5. D. Jurafsky and J. H. Martin, Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009).
  6. E. Agichtein and L. Gravano, "Snowball: Extracting relations from large plain-text collections," in Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries (2000), pp. 85-94.
  7. P. Mitra, C. L. Giles, B. Sun, and Y. Liu, "Chemxseer: A digital library and data repository for chemical kinetics," in Proceedings of the ACM First Workshop on CyberInfrastructure: information Management in eScience (2007), pp. 7-10.
  8. Y. Liu, K. Bai, P. Mitra, and C. L. Giles, "Tableseer: Automatic table metadata extraction and searching in digital libraries," in Proceedings of the 7th ACM/ IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (2007), pp. 91-100.
  9. M. Ebraheem, S. Thirumuruganathan, S. Joty, M. Ouzzani, and N. Tang, "DeepER-Deep entity resolution," arXiv:1710.00597 (2017). · arXiv
  10. D. Jung et al., "ChartSense: Interactive data extraction from chart images," in Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2017), pp. 6706-6717.
  11. X. Xia, C. Xu, and B. Nan, "Inception-v3 for flower classification," in 2017 2nd International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC) (IEEE, 2017), pp. 783-787. 133

Authors
Olivetti, E. A., Cole, J. M., Kim, E., Kononova, O., Ceder, G., Han, T. Y.-J., & Hiszpanski, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (GB)
  • Xerox (Canada) (CA)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Olivetti, Elsa A.
Venue
Applied Physics Reviews
Published
2020-12-01
Volume
7
Issue
4
ISSN
1931-9401 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3115677442
Cited by
302
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 16
FWCI
11.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Physics Reviews (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1922311, 1922372, 1922090)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC52-07NA27344)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-20-1-2280, N00014-19-1-2114)
  • Royal Academy of Engineering (RCSRF1819\7\10)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Keywords
natural language processing, information extraction, materials science literature, text mining, data compilation, scientific literature mining, hypothesis generation, research trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review