Cited by 5Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular InteractionsProtein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

Optimizing reaction coordinate by flux maximization in the transition path ensemble

Open access
Li, Wenjin·2022·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The transition path ensemble is a collection of reactive trajectories, all of which largely keep going forward along the transition channel from the reactant state to the product one, and is believed to possess the information necessary for the identification of reaction coordinates. Previously, the full coordinates (both position and momentum) of the snapshots in the transition path ensemble were utilized to obtain the reaction coordinate [W. Li and A. Ma, J. Chem. Phys. 144, 114103 (2016) and W. Li, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 084105 (2018)]. Here, with the conformational (or position) coordinates alone, it is suggested that a meaningful one-dimensional representation of the reaction coordinate can be obtained by maximizing the flux (the net number of transitions through the dividing surface) of a given coordinate in the transition path ensemble. In the application to alanine dipeptide in vacuum, dihedral angles ϕ and θ were identified to be the two best reaction coordinates, which was consistent with the results in the existing studies. A linear combination of these two coordinates gave a better reaction coordinate, which is highly correlated with the committor. Most importantly, the method obtained a linear combination of pairwise distances between heavy atoms, which was highly correlated with the committor as well. The standard deviation of the committor at the transition region defined by the optimized reaction coordinate is as small as 0.08. In addition, the effects of practical factors, such as the choice of transition path sub-ensembles and saving interval between frames in transition paths, on reaction coordinate optimization were also considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/5.0079390

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Li, W.
Affiliations
Shenzhen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Wenjin
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2022-02-07
Volume
156
Issue
5
Pages
054117-054117
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W4220948342
Cited by
5
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 4
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • The Journal of Chemical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2020A1515010984)
  • Start-up Grand for Young Scientists, Shenzhen University, China (860-000002110384)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
dividing surface, committor, reactive trajectories, alanine dipeptide, dihedral angle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review