KIF—Key Interactions Finder: A program to identify the key molecular interactions that regulate protein conformational changes
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Simulation datasets of proteins (e.g., those generated by molecular dynamics simulations) are filled with information about how a non-covalent interaction network within a protein regulates the conformation and, thus, function of the said protein. Most proteins contain thousands of non-covalent interactions, with most of these being largely irrelevant to any single conformational change. The ability to automatically process any protein simulation dataset to identify non-covalent interactions that are strongly associated with a single, defined conformational change would be a highly valuable tool for the community. Furthermore, the insights generated from this tool could be applied to basic research, in order to improve understanding of a mechanism of action, or for protein engineering, to identify candidate mutations to improve/alter the functionality of any given protein. The open-source Python package Key Interactions Finder (KIF) enables users to identify those non-covalent interactions that are strongly associated with any conformational change of interest for any protein simulated. KIF gives the user full control to define the conformational change of interest as either a continuous variable or categorical variable, and methods from statistics or machine learning can be applied to identify and rank the interactions and residues distributed throughout the protein, which are relevant to the conformational change. Finally, KIF has been applied to three diverse model systems (protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B, the PDZ3 domain, and the KE07 series of Kemp eliminases) in order to illustrate its power to identify key features that regulate functionally important conformational dynamics.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics
Chodera, J. D., & Noé, F. (2014) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.002 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Machine learning approaches for analyzing and enhancing molecular dynamics simulations
Wang, Y., Lamim Ribeiro, J. M., & Tiwary, P. (2020) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2019.12.016 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Crean, R. M., Slusky, J. S. G., Kasson, P. M., & Kamerlin, S. C. L.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- University of Kansas (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2023-04-13
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 144114-144114
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W4361287551
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Chemical Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Carl Tryggers Foundation for Scientific Research (CTS 19:172)
- Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (2018.0140 and 2019.0431)
- Swedish Research Council (2019-03499)
- American-Scandinavian Foundation
- Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (2019/2-1, 2019/3-258 and 2020/5-250)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- non-covalent interactions, protein conformational change, molecular dynamics simulation data, protein dynamics, protein engineering, PTP1B, PDZ3 domain, Kemp eliminase
- MeSH terms
- Molecular Conformation, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Engineering, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review