Cited by 14Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

Effects of a fire-retardant chemical to fathead minnows in experimental streams

Calfee, Robin D., Little, Edward E.·2003·Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract

Background Each year millions of liters of fire-retardant chemicals are applied to wildfires across the nation. Recent laboratory studies with long-term fire-retardant chemicals indicate a significant photoenhanced toxicity of products containing sodium ferrocyanide corrosion inhibitors. Our objective of this study was to determine the toxicity of fire-retardant chemicals to fathead minnows during exposure in experimental outdoor streams. Methods Stream tests were conducted to determine the potential toxicity of a pulse of exposure as might occur when fire retardant chemical is rinsed from the watershed by rainfall. Two artificial 55-meter experimental streams were dosed with different concentrations of Fire-Trol GTS-R, or uncontaminated for a control. Replicate groups of fathead minnows were added to screened containers (10 fish per container) and exposed to retardant chemicals in the recirculating flow of the stream for up to 6 hours. Results and discussion Under field conditions toxicity of GTS-R only occurred in the presence of sunlight. When GTS-R was tested on sunny days, 100% mortality occurred. However, when tested during heavily overcast conditions, no mortality occurred. Conclusions Lethal concentrations of cyanide were measured when GTS-R with YPS exposures were conducted under sunny conditions, but not under cloudy conditions, indicating that a minimum UV level is necessary to induce toxicity as well as the release of cyanide from YPS. The toxicity observed with GTS-R was likely associated with lethal concentrations of cyanide. Rainwater runoff following applications of this fire-retardant at the recommended rate could result in lethal concentrations in small ponds and streams receiving limited water flow under sunny conditions. Recommendations and outlook In addition to avoiding application to aquatic habitats, it is important to consider characteristics of the treated site including soil binding affinity and erosive properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1065/espr2003.03.148

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 14

Authors
Calfee, R. D., & Little, E. E.
Affiliations
  • Columbia Environmental Research Center (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Little, Edward E.
Venue
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Published
2003-09
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
296-300
ISSN
  • 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7499
OpenAlex
W2003620609
Cited by
14
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Keywords
flame retardants, fathead minnow, sodium ferrocyanide, cyanide poisoning, ultraviolet radiation, aquatic toxicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Cyprinidae, Environmental Exposure, Ferrocyanides, Flame Retardants, Lethal Dose 50, Photochemistry, Sunlight, Water Movements, Water Pollutants, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review