Cited by 65Disaster Response and ManagementDisaster Management and ResilienceFacility Location and Emergency Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Generic evaluation methods for disaster drills in developing countries

Green, Gary B., Modi, Surbhi, Lunney, Kevin, Thomas, Tamara L.·2003·Annals of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Disaster simulations (drills) are widely used throughout the world and are considered a fundamental tool for evaluation and improvement of local disaster response capacity. Despite this, no generally accepted methodology exists for quantitative evaluation of the medical response to a disaster drill. We therefore set out to develop and prospectively test a comprehensive method to assess both medical provider and organizational performance during a disaster simulation. Because disasters disproportionately affect the populations of developing countries, we designed these methods to be sufficiently flexible to be applicable in both the developed and the developing world. Objective outcome measures were identified for each component of disaster medical response and were incorporated into 3 data collection instruments. The derived methods were applied to a multiagency disaster simulation in Guatemala City, Guatemala. On the basis of this pilot study, suggested modifications and recommendations were made. The ability to objectively identify the specific strengths and weaknesses of an emergency medical services systems' medical response to a disaster is an important step toward optimizing system performance. On the basis of our experience, we recommend the incorporation of objective evaluation methods such as these into every disaster simulation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mem.2003.147

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Waeckerle, 1994, Disaster medicine: challenges for today, Ann Emerg Med, 23, 715, 10.1016/S0196-0644(94)70304-3 · DOI
  2. Lillibridge, 1993, Disaster assessment: the emergency health evaluation of a population affected by a disaster, Ann Emerg Med, 22, 1715, 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81311-3 · DOI
  3. Walz, 1992, Disaster training exercises: an education-based hierarchy, Prehosp Disaster Med, 7, 386, 10.1017/S1049023X00039820 · DOI
  4. Klain, 1989, Disaster reanimatology potentials: a structured interview study in Armenia: I. Methodology and preliminary results, Prehosp Disaster Med, 4, 135, 10.1017/S1049023X00029939 · DOI
  5. Ricci, 1991, Disaster reanimatology potentials: a structured interview study in Armenia II. Method for the evaluation of the medical response to major disasters, Prehosp Disaster Med, 6, 159, 10.1017/S1049023X00028284 · DOI
  6. Pretto, 1992, Disaster reanimatology potentials: a structured interview study in Armenia. III. Results, conclusions, recommendations, Prehosp Disaster Med, 7, 327, 10.1017/S1049023X00039741 · DOI
  7. Ricci, 1991, Assessment of prehospital and hospital response in disaster, Crit Care Clin, 7, 471, 10.1016/S0749-0704(18)30317-8 · DOI
  8. Noji, 1996, Disaster epidemiology, Emerg Med Clin North Am, 14, 289, 10.1016/S0733-8627(05)70252-2 · DOI
  9. Task Force on Quality Control of Disaster Management, World Association of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, 1996, Disaster medical response research: a template in the Utstein style, Prehosp Disaster Med, 11, 82, 10.1017/S1049023X00042692 · DOI
  10. Quarantelli, 1997, Ten criteria for evaluating the management of community disasters, Disasters, 21, 39, 10.1111/1467-7717.00043 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Green, G. B., Modi, S., Lunney, K., & Thomas, T. L.
Affiliations
Loma Linda University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
689-699
ISSN
0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072225851
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Facility Location and Emergency Management
Keywords
disaster drills, disaster simulation, disaster medical response, emergency medical services, disaster response capacity, performance evaluation, developing countries, multi-agency coordination, evaluation methodology
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Developing Countries, Disaster Planning, Humans, Pilot Projects, Program Evaluation, Program Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review