Cited by 114Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Recognition of patients who require emergency assistance: A descriptive study

Cioffi, Jane·2000·Heart & Lung

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to explore and describe the patient characteristics and the process of recognition nurses use to recognize patients about whom they are seriously worried. Design The study design was qualitative, exploratory, and descriptive, and it used in-depth interviews and a purposive sample. Setting The study setting included a teaching hospital and a peripheral hospital in a Sydney area health service. Participants Participants included registered nurses (N = 32) with 5 or more years of experience and a history of calling the medical emergency team (MET). Mean years of experience as a registered nurse was 14 years, and the mean calls to the MET since employed in current hospital was 16 calls. Findings Primary findings showed that nurses relied on 4 patient characteristics to apply the MET criterion, "seriously worried about a patient." These 4 characteristics were (1) feeling "not right," (2) color, (3) agitation, and (4) observations marginally changed or not changed at all. The process used to gather and interpret information to recognize these patients who were deteriorating involved touching, observing, listening, feeling or sensing, and "knowing." In this process of recognition, nurses relied heavily on past experiences and knowledge to detect differences in patient condition. Conclusions The 4 characteristics need to be included as an explanation for the MET criterion, "seriously worried about a patient." Additional validation and refinemen…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mhl.2000.108327

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 114

Authors
Cioffi, J.
Affiliations
Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Cioffi, Jane
Venue
Heart & Lung
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-07
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
262-268
ISSN
0147-9563 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137476191
Cited by
114
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heart & Lung (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
patient deterioration recognition, medical emergency team, patient characteristics, early warning signs, clinical decision-making, nurses' experiences
MeSH terms
Australia, Decision Making, Emergencies, Emergency Medicine, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Nursing Diagnosis, Patients, Severity of Illness Index, Clinical Nursing Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review