Cited by 40Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

The effects of metronome breathing on the variability of autonomic activity measurements

Driscoll, Darcy, DiCicco, Guy·2000·Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Abstract

Background Many chiropractors hypothesize that spinal manipulation affects the autonomic nervous system (ANS). However, the ANS responses to chiropractic manipulative therapy are not well documented, and more research is needed to support this hypothesis. This study represents a step toward the development of a reliable method by which to document that chiropractic manipulative therapy does affect the ANS by exploring the use of paced breathing as a way to reduce the inherent variability in ANS measurements. Objective To examine the hypothesis that the variability of ANS measurements would be reduced if breathing were paced to a metronome at 12 breaths/min. Setting The study was performed at Parker College Research Institute. Eight normotensive subjects were recruited from the student body and staff. Methods Respiration frequency was measured through a strain gauge. A 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was used to register the electric activity of the heart, and arterial tonometry monitors were used to record the left and right radial artery blood pressures. Signals were recorded on an IBM-compatible computer with a sampling frequency of 100 Hz. Normal breathing was used for the first 3 recordings, and breathing was paced to a metronome for the final 3 recordings at 12 breaths/min. Fourier analysis was performed on the beat-by-beat fluctuations of the ECG-determined R-R interval and systolic arterial pressure (SBP). Low-frequency fluctuations (LF; 0.04-0.15 Hz) reflected sympathe…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mmt.2000.110944

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Driscoll, D., & DiCicco, G.
Affiliations
Parker University (US)
Venue
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Published
2000-11
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
610-614
ISSN
0161-4754 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008049691
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
paced breathing, autonomic nervous system, heart rate variability, blood pressure variability, sympathetic activity, parasympathetic activity, measurement variability, respiratory rate, RR interval, normotensive subjects, coefficient of variation
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Autonomic Nervous System, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Breathing Exercises, Chiropractic, Electrocardiography, Female, Fourier Analysis, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Respiration, Sensitivity and Specificity, Manipulation, Spinal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review