Cited by 167Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsHistorical Medical Research and Treatments

Congenital syphilis after maternal treatment for syphilis during pregnancy

Sheffield, Jeanne S., Sánchez, Pablo J., Morris, George, Maberry, Mark, Zeray, Fiker, McIntire, Donald D., Wendel, George D.·2002·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to characterize pregnancies that were complicated by maternal syphilis that had been treated before delivery in which the newborn infant was diagnosed with congenital syphilis.Study design Prospective surveillance from January 1, 1982, to December 31, 1998, involved women who received antenatal treatment for syphilis. Infants who were born with congenital syphilis were identified by clinical or laboratory criteria. Antepartum factors such as gestational age, time to delivery and VDRL titers were then analyzed and compared with those of women who had been treated and who were delivered of an uninfected infant. The 1:1 match was based on the stage of syphilis and the gestational age at treatment.Results Forty-three women who received antepartum therapy for syphilis were delivered of an infant with congenital syphilis. Most of the women had been treated for early syphilis; the mean gestational age at treatment was 30.3 weeks. Thirty-five percent of the women were treated >30 days before delivery. Fifty-six percent of the infants were preterm. The 1:1 match revealed that treatment and delivery high VDRL titers, prematurity, and a short interval from treatment to delivery were significantly different in those infants who were diagnosed with congenital syphilis.Conclusion High VDRL titers at treatment and delivery, earlier maternal stage of syphilis, the interval from treatment to delivery, and delivery of an infant at < or =36 weeks' gestation are associated with the delivery of a congenitally infected neonate after adequate treatment for maternal syphilis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mob.2002.121541

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 167

Authors
Sheffield, J. S., Sánchez, P. J., Morris, G., Maberry, M., Zeray, F., McIntire, D. D., & Wendel, G. D.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-03
Volume
186
Issue
3
Pages
569-573
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011900735
Cited by
167
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (7297297295-2000)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Historical Medical Research and Treatments
Keywords
congenital syphilis, maternal syphilis, VDRL titers, preterm birth, gestational age at treatment, early syphilis, neonatal infection
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Penicillin G Benzathine, Penicillins, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Prospective Studies, Syphilis, Syphilis, Congenital, Time Factors, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review