The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Mattiasson, 1998, Standarization of outcome studies in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction: a report on general principles from the Standardisation Committee of the International Continence Society, Neururol Urodyn, 17, 249, 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(1998)17:3<249::AID-NAU9>3.0.CO;2-D · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1998)17:3<249::aid-nau9>3.0.co;2-d
- Lose, 1998, Outcome measures for research in adult women with symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction, Neurourol Urodyn, 17, 255, 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(1998)17:3<255::AID-NAU10>3.0.CO;2-J · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1998)17:3<255::aid-nau10>3.0.co;2-j
- Wall, 1998, Evaluating the outcome of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 178, 877, 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70517-4 · DOI
- Gill, 1994, A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements, JAMA, 272, 619, 10.1001/jama.1994.03520080061045 · DOI · Paper page
- Norton, 2002, Duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 187, 40, 10.1067/mob.2002.124840 · DOI · Paper page
- Zinner, 2002, Duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), Neurourol Urodyn, 21, 383
- Wagner, 1996, Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure, Urology, 47, 67, 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80384-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Patrick, 1999, Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QOL), Urology, 53, 71, 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00454-3 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Singh, J. B., Fedgchin, M., Daly, E. J., De Boer, P., Cooper, K., Lim, P., Pinter, C., Murrough, J. W., Sanacora, G., Shelton, R. C., et al. (2016) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16010037 · Cited by 525
Dumoulin, C., Cacciari, L. P., & Hay-Smith, E. J. C. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005654.pub4 · Cited by 486
A Randomized Trial of Urodynamic Testing before Stress-Incontinence Surgery
Nager, C. W., Brubaker, L., Litman, H. J., Zyczynski, H. M., Varner, R. E., Amundsen, C., Sirls, L. T., Norton, P. A., Arisco, A. M., Chai, T. C., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1113595 · Cited by 466
Jelovsek, J. E., Barber, M. D., Brubaker, L., Norton, P., Gantz, M., Richter, H. E., Weidner, A., Menefee, S., Schaffer, J., Pugh, N., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.2827 · Cited by 256
Mobile app for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A randomized controlled trial
Asklund, I., Nyström, E., Sjöström, M., Umefjord, G., Stenlund, H., & Samuelsson, E. (2017) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.23116 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Yalcin, I., & Bump, R. C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 189
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 98-101
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993057480
- Cited by
- 887
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1067/mob.2003.379
- The paper
- Yalcin, I., & Bump, R. C. (2003). Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
