Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: Five-year results of a randomized trial

Open access
Green, Richard M, Abbott, William M, Matsumoto, Teruo, Wheeler, Jock R, Miller, Normand, Veith, Frank J, Money, Sam, Edward Garrett, H·2000·Journal of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

PURPOSE: This trial was designed to identify factors affecting patency rates of primary prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafts at 5 years. METHODS: A multi-institutional, prospective trial randomized 240 patients to compare patency rates of Gore-tex and Hemashield above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafts at 5 years. Univariate comparisons of patency between levels of each prognostic variable were made with the Kaplan-Meier method. Variables that had a univariate P value less than.25 or those known to be important were submitted to a Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The patient survival rate at 5 years was 59.4%. There were no differences in primary or secondary patency rates at 5 years between the two graft materials (primary, 45% vs 43% and secondary, 68% vs 68%). The risk for graft occlusion was significantly increased for patients younger than 65 years (2.1; P =.001) and for grafts with a diameter less than 7 mm (1.65; P =.0219). Variables with no apparent independent effect on patency rates were smoking status, runoff, diabetes mellitus, sex, presenting symptoms, and postoperative treatment with aspirin or Coumadin. Noninvasive test results were not predictive of subsequent graft function. CONCLUSION: Although the type of prosthetic used for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafts does not affect 5-year patency rates, age and graft size do influence results. These factors should be considered before a prosthetic bypass grafting procedure. Furthermore, these data should serve as a contemporary standard, with which evolving and conventional procedures can be compared.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0741-5214(00)90300-8

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Green, R. M., Abbott, W. M., Matsumoto, T., Wheeler, J. R., Miller, N., Veith, F. J., Money, S., & Edward Garrett, H.
Venue
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-03
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
417-425
ISSN
0741-5214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045973896
Cited by
202
References
0
FWCI
9.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: Five-year results of a randomized trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0741-5214(00)90300-8
The paper
Green, R. M., Abbott, W. M., Matsumoto, T., Wheeler, J. R., Miller, N., Veith, F. J., Money, S., & Edward Garrett, H. (2000). Prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: Five-year results of a randomized trial. Journal of Vascular Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0741-5214(00)90300-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.