The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accessibility and Intraurban Travel
Abstract
This paper contains an examination of the fundamental assumption underlying the use of accessibility indicators: that an individual's travel behavior is related to his or her location vis-à-vis the distribution of potential activity sites. First, the conceptual and measurement issues surrounding accessibility and its relationship to travel are reviewed; then, an access measure for individuals is formulated. Using data from the Uppsala (Sweden) Household Travel Survey and controlling for sex, automobile availability, and employment status, the authors explore the relationship between both home- and work-based accessibility and five aspects of an individual's travel: mode use, trip frequencies and travel distances for discretionary purposes, trip complexity, travel in conjunction with the journey to work, and size of the activity space. From the results it can be seen that although all of these travel characteristics are related to accessibility to some degree, the travel–accessibility relationship is not as strong as deductive formulations have implied. High accessibility levels are associated with higher proportions of travel by nonmotorized means, lower levels of automobile use, reduced travel distances for certain discretionary trip purposes, and smaller individual activity spaces. Furthermore, the density of activity sites around the workplace affects the distances travelled by employed people for discretionary purposes. Overall, accessibility level has a greater impact on mode use and travel distance than it does on discretionary trip frequency. This result was unexpected in light of the strong trip frequency–accessibility relationship posited frequently in the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., & Frank, L. D. (2003) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2502_03 · Cited by 2,301
Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives
Handy, S. L., & Niemeier, D. A. (1997) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a291175 · Cited by 1,643
Kwan, M. (1998) · Geographical Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1998.tb00396.x · Cited by 1,156
A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area
Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Laidet, L. (1997) · Transportation · doi:10.1023/a:1017959825565 · Cited by 1,045
Does neighborhood design influence travel?: A behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data
Crane, R., & Crepeau, R. (1998) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/s1361-9209(98)00001-7 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanson, S., & Schwab, M.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1987-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 735-748
- ISSN
- 0308-518X (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3409
- OpenAlex
- W2072987713
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accessibility and Intraurban Travel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/a190735
- The paper
- Hanson, S., & Schwab, M. (1987). Accessibility and Intraurban Travel. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. https://doi.org/10.1068/a190735
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.