CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 148

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A View on the GIS Crisis in Geography, or, Using GIS to Put Humpty-Dumpty Back Together Again

Openshaw, S·1991·Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
DOI 10.1068/a230621
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/a230621

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Formal geospatial modeling and analyses provide a suite of tools that can be used in both uncritical, overly reductive, and critical, subjectively-informed ways.

    “Formal geospatial modeling and analyses provide a suite of tools that can be used in both uncritical, overly reductive, and critical, subjectively-informed ways (Openshaw 1991).”

    From Counter-Mapping Maroon Cartographies: GIS and Anticolonial Modeling in St. Croix (2023) · cites this paper as Openshaw 1991

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Openshaw, S.
Venue
Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1991-05
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
621-628
ISSN
  • 0308-518X
  • 1472-3409
DOI
10.1068/a230621
Cited by
148
References
0
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review