Cited by 21Canadian Policy and GovernanceGlobal trade and economicsWorld Trade Organization Law

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

International Trade Relations and Regional Industrial Adjustment: The Implications of the 1982–86 Canadian-US Softwood Lumber Dispute for British Columbia

Hayter, R·1992·Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space

Abstract

To contribute towards a better understanding of the evolving relationships between international trade relations and regional industrial adjustment the author examines the implications of the Canada-US softwood lumber dispute that occurred during the 1980s for the softwood lumber industry of British Columbia. Conceptually, these implications are discussed within a progressively more focused series of trade-relations contexts based on principles of political economy and which are represented by the concepts of complex interdependence, continentalism, and bargaining. Empirically, it is found that the dispute led to an unanticipated and undesirable outcome for the lumber industry of British Columbia. Paradoxically, the dispute provides further encouragement for the lumber industry to diversify its operations, a trend which can be considered beneficial.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/a240153

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Britton J N H, 1978, “The weakest link: A technological perspective on Canadian industrial development”
  2. Canada, Energy, Mines and Resources, 1979, National Energy Programme
  3. Canadian Press, 1990, “U.S. resists attempts to reopen lumber deal” The Vancouver Sun November 2, C5
  4. Foreign Investment Review Agency, 1977, Foreign Investment Review Act
  5. Hayter R, 1985, Fennia, 163, 439
  6. Hayter R, 1988, “Technology and the Canadian forest product industries: A technological perspective”
  7. Paley Report, 1952, The Report of the Resident's Materials Policy Commission: Resources for Freedom, 5
  8. Percy M B, 1987, “The softwood lumber dispute and Canada—US trade in natural resources”
  9. Price Waterhouse, 1989, “The forest industry in British Columbia 1988”
  10. Rugman A M, 1987, “The softwood lumber decision of 1986: Broadening the nature of US administered protection”
  11. Schwindt R, 1987, Resource Rents and Public Policy in Western Canada, 181
  12. Williams G, 1983, Not For Export: Towards a Political Economy of Canada's Arrested Industrialization

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Hayter, R.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Hayter, R
Venue
Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
Published
1992-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
153-170
ISSN
  • 0308-518X (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-3409
OpenAlex
W2001506090
Cited by
21
References
28
Citations by year
2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environment and Planning A Economy and Space (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Canadian Policy and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Trade Organization Law
Keywords
softwood lumber dispute, US-Canada trade relations, complex interdependence, continentalism, industrial diversification, political economy of trade

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Trade Relations and Regional Industrial Adjustment: The Implications of the 1982–86 Canadian-US Softwood Lumber Dispute for British Columbia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/a240153
The paper
Hayter, R. (1992). International Trade Relations and Regional Industrial Adjustment: The Implications of the 1982–86 Canadian-US Softwood Lumber Dispute for British Columbia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. https://doi.org/10.1068/a240153