The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Financial Imperative or Conservation Concern? EU Farmers' Motivations for Participation in Voluntary Agri-Environmental Schemes
Abstract
Based on a large transnational research project that involved questionnaires with 1000 farm households in nine EU countries and Switzerland, this paper investigates factors influencing farmers' participation in agri-environmental schemes (AESs). Analysis of motivations for AES participation highlights that complex patterns of AESs are in operation. Pronounced geographical differences in farmers' reactions towards schemes can be identified, with responses by farmers from northern member states often differing from those in Mediterranean countries, and with arable farmers often responding differently from grassland farmers. Yet, the study also highlights that much common ground exists and that conceptual frameworks for the understanding of farmers' participation in AESs developed in the United Kingdom can be successfully applied outside the British context. Common participation patterns include the importance of financial imperatives and ‘goodness of fit’, and the influence of similar sets of factors such as farm size, tenure, or farm type. The growing importance of conservation-oriented motivations for AES participation across Europe suggests the emergence of a ‘new hypothesis’ which highlights that the financial imperative for participation does not necessarily exclude an often equally important environmental concern. The paper concludes by indicating where current agri-environmental policy (AEP) may be failing adequately to address structural and socioeconomic characteristics of targeted farming populations, and by arguing that understanding participation decisionmaking is only the first step in an attempt to assess the ‘effectiveness’ of AEP. Further comparative research is needed to investigate in detail more complex indicators of scheme success, in particular what effects scheme participation has on farmers' incomes, farmers' environmental attitudes, and on the environmental quality of the countryside targeted by AESs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Journal of environmental management
(1973) · Environmental Pollution (1970) · doi:10.1016/0013-9327(73)90062-1 · Cited by 2,461
Recruiting the new conservationists: Farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the U.K.
Morris, C., & Potter, C. (1995) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/0743-0167(94)00037-a · Cited by 364
Bigmore, P., Marsden, T., Murdoch, J., Lowe, P., Munton, R., & Flynn, A. (1994) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.2307/622454 · Cited by 345
Pahl, R. E., & Marsden, T. (1994) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/3059626 · Cited by 267
THE AGRICULTURAL TREADMILL AND THE RURAL ENVIRONMENT IN THE POST‐PRODUCTIVIST ERA
WARD, N. (1993) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.1993.tb00969.x · Cited by 198
Agri-environmental Policy in the European Union
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315204390 · Cited by 150
Environmental Indicators and Agricultural Policy
Brouwer, F., & Crabtree, B. (1999) · CABI Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851992891.0000 · Cited by 98
Unbroken Threads? Succession and its Effects on Family Farms in Britain
Potter, C., & Lobley, M. (1996) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.1996.tb00023.x · Cited by 96
ILBERY, B. W. (1978) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/030913257800200303 · Cited by 70
Farmer participation in voluntary land diversion schemes: Some observations from theory
Brotherton, I. (1989) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/0743-0167(89)90008-9 · Cited by 69
Cited by
Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research
Knowler, D., & Bradshaw, B. (2007) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003 · Cited by 1,839
Exploring Farmers' Cultural Resistance to Voluntary Agri‐environmental Schemes
Burton, R. J. F., Kuczera, C., & Schwarz, G. (2008) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00452.x · Cited by 591
Defrancesco, E., Gatto, P., Runge, F., & Trestini, S. (2008) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00134.x · Cited by 465
European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review
van Zanten, B. T., Verburg, P. H., Espinosa, M., Gomez-y-Paloma, S., Galimberti, G., Kantelhardt, J., Kapfer, M., Lefebvre, M., Manrique, R., Piorr, A., et al. (2014) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-013-0183-4 · Cited by 377
Ruto, E., & Garrod, G. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640560902958172 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, G. A., & Hart, K.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2161-2185
- ISSN
- 0308-518X (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3409
- OpenAlex
- W2016138864
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 18.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Financial Imperative or Conservation Concern? EU Farmers' Motivations for Participation in Voluntary Agri-Environmental Schemes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/a3311
- The paper
- Wilson, G. A., & Hart, K. (2000). Financial Imperative or Conservation Concern? EU Farmers' Motivations for Participation in Voluntary Agri-Environmental Schemes. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.