The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Urban Sustainability: Learning from Best Practice?
Open accessAbstract
In the quest for sustainable development, numerous examples of ‘best practice’ have been created and circulated in national and international arenas. Yet despite the vast array of examples, demonstration projects, case studies, and the like, little is known about the ways in which best practices are produced and used, and their role in processes of policymaking. Focusing on best practice for urban sustainability, the author argues that, rather than conceptualising its role and impact in terms of policy transfer or lesson drawing, the creation, dissemination, and use of best practice can be better understood as a discursive process, in which not only is new knowledge created about a policy problem, but the nature and interpretation of the policy problem itself are challenged and reframed. Drawing on insights from concepts of governmentality, the author argues that best practices are at once a political rationality and a governmental technology through which the policy problem of urban sustainability is framed and defined. Illustrations of the practice of best practice show how contradictions emerge between claims for general applicability and the need for policy actors to understand the contingencies of the process of urban sustainability, in order to enrol it for their own struggles over sustainability. The local stickiness of best practices points to the very real struggles that the rationalities of urban sustainability have in competing with other governmentalities which seek to shape urban futures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain
Hall, P. A. (1993) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.2307/422246 · Cited by 7,369
Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy‐Making
Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000) · Governance · doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00121 · Cited by 3,314
The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change
Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf00138786 · Cited by 1,346
Cited by
KERN, K., & BULKELEY, H. (2009) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.00806.x · Cited by 719
Self-citationWhat have we Learned from Policy Transfer Research? Dolowitz and Marsh Revisited
Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2011) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00240.x · Cited by 476
Urban sustainability experiments in Asia: patterns and pathways
Bai, X., Roberts, B., & Chen, J. (2010) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.03.011 · Cited by 295
Revisiting lesson-drawing: methods to assess policy’s institutional transferability
Yamada, M. (2026) · Policy Design and Practice · doi:10.1080/25741292.2025.2574112 · Cited by 1
“For instance, Bulkeley (2006) points out that the way in which the best practice frames the policy problem is not always the same as the way the problem is, or should be, framed in the given jurisdiction.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Bulkeley, H.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1029-1044
- ISSN
- 0308-518X (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3409
- OpenAlex
- W2002992217
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urban Sustainability: Learning from Best Practice? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/a37300
- The paper
- Bulkeley, H. (2006). Urban Sustainability: Learning from Best Practice? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37300
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.