Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 92Urban Transport and AccessibilityMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationGender, Health, and Social Inequality

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender, Ethnicity, and Constrained Mobility: Insights into the Resultant Social Exclusion

Uteng, Tanu Priya·2009·Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space

Abstract

I posit that a comprehensive picture of transport-related social exclusion can be drawn only by a simultaneous examination of place-based, people-based, and infrastructure and system-based exclusionary mechanisms. The overlap of these three factors has been examined here through the case study of non-Western immigrant women in Norway. It is known that immobility serves the aim of segregating roles and household responsibilities in different sociocultural domains. But what happens when these roles are operated in a society with a varying outlook? For example, how are the immigrant women of non-Western cultures dealing with constrained mobility in a modern society like Norway? Is it leading to their social exclusion? Following a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods, this paper furthers the discussion on constrained mobility as a constitutive factor of social exclusion.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/a40254

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Albertsen N, 2001, Nordisk Arkitekturforskning, 14, 13
  2. Andezian S, 1986, International Migration: The Female Experience, 254
  3. Byberg I H, 2002, Immigrant Women in Norway: A Summary of Findings on Demography, Education, Labour and Income
  4. Denstadli J M, 2006, “Den nasjonale reisevaneundersøkelsen 2005–nøkkelrapport” [The national travel behaviour research 2005–key report]
  5. Kaufmann V, 2002, Re-thinking Mobility
  6. Knie A, 1997, Soziale Welt, 47, 39
  7. Lamphere L, 1986, International Migration: The Female Experience, 266
  8. Lyons G, 2003, “Transport and society”, inaugural lecture
  9. Massey D, 1994, Space, Place and Gender
  10. Polk M, 1998, Gendered Mobility—A Study of Women's and Men's Relations to Automobility in Sweden
  11. Schafer A, 2000, Transportation Research A, 34, 171
  12. Sørensen K H, 1999, “Rush-hour blues or the whistle of freedom? Understanding modern mobility”

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Uteng, T. P.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Uteng, Tanu Priya
Venue
Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
Published
2009-05
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
1055-1071
ISSN
  • 0308-518X (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-3409
OpenAlex
W2019868146
Cited by
85
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environment and Planning A Economy and Space (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
constrained mobility, social exclusion, gender, ethnicity, transportation, immobility, domestic roles, segregation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.