Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 519

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Street Trees and Equity: Evaluating the Spatial Distribution of an Urban Amenity

Landry, Shawn M, Chakraborty, Jayajit·2009·Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space

Abstract

While urban disamenities and pollution sources have received considerable attention in environmental justice research, few studies have examined sociospatial inequities associated with the distribution of desirable land uses. In this paper we focus on addressing this limitation by investigating the environmental equity implications of street trees—an important publicly financed amenity that provides several direct and indirect benefits to urban residents. The specific objective was to determine if the spatial distribution of public right-of-way trees is equitable with respect to race and ethnicity, income, and housing tenure in the city of Tampa, Florida, USA. We seek to extend research on equity analysis of urban amenities through several methodological innovations, including: (a) accounting for the heterogeneity of urban land use; (b) utilizing high-resolution remote sensing techniques to quantify parcel-specific tree cover; and (c) using multivariate regression models that control for spatial dependence within the data. The results support the inequity hypothesis by indicating a significantly lower proportion of tree cover on public right-of-way in neighborhoods containing a higher proportion of African-Americans, low-income residents, and renters. These findings have important implications for local public investment and policy strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/a41236

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Parks and People: An Environmental Justice Inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland

    Boone, C. G., Buckley, G. L., Grove, J. M., & Sister, C. (2009) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045600903102949 · Cited by 828 · cited 3×

    “Although potential causal mechanisms have been discussed by many authors (eg Lindsey et al, 2001), few studies have used longitudinal analysis to directly investigate the complex temporal dimensions associated with process equity (eg Boone et al, 2009; Wells et al, 2008; Wolch et al, 2005).”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 519

Metadata

Authors
Landry, S. M., & Chakraborty, J.
Venue
Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
Published
2009-11
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
2651-2670
ISSN
  • 0308-518X (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-3409
OpenAlex
W2105865885
Cited by
519
References
1
FWCI
26.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Street Trees and Equity: Evaluating the Spatial Distribution of an Urban Amenity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/a41236
The paper
Landry, S. M., & Chakraborty, J. (2009). Street Trees and Equity: Evaluating the Spatial Distribution of an Urban Amenity. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41236

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.