The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Policy Transfer as Policy Assemblage: Making Policy for the Creative Industries in New Zealand
Abstract
The study of policy transfer appeals to geography and cognate disciplines because it offers a powerful way of conceptualising how policy regimes travel and internationalise. This is reflected in its use for understanding uneven processes of recent state restructuring, usually referred to as neoliberalisation. In this paper I adopt an assemblage perspective on policy transfer that, instead of emphasising broad processes of change, focuses on how the objects of a transferred policy are constituted in different places. Using the case of the transfer of the creative industries policy concept from the UK to New Zealand as an example, I argue that the rendering of policy objects using, in this case, specific calculate techniques constitutes them as a global form universal to different places. However, this process does not run smoothly; it requires that the policy object is articulated in a policy assemblage in the new site. The work of assembly requires a range of different kinds of work, including the alignment of divergent political motivations, the translation of different ideas, and the invention of new concepts and programmes. This demonstrates how policy transfer is political and technical, and that its study can benefit from analyses that traverse both these aspects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century
Rodrik, D. (2004) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.617544 · Cited by 1,623
Thrift, N. (2005) · doi:10.4135/9781446211458 · Cited by 890
Cited by
What have we Learned from Policy Transfer Research? Dolowitz and Marsh Revisited
Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2011) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00240.x · Cited by 476
Assemblage thinking as methodology: commitments and practices for critical policy research
Baker, T., & McGuirk, P. (2017) · Territory, Politics, Governance · doi:10.1080/21622671.2016.1231631 · Cited by 294
McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2013) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2012.748563 · Cited by 272
Loose threads: The translocal making of public space policy in Hanoi
Söderström, O., & Geertman, S. (2013) · Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography · doi:10.1111/sjtg.12027 · Cited by 42
Revisiting lesson-drawing: methods to assess policy’s institutional transferability
Yamada, M. (2026) · Policy Design and Practice · doi:10.1080/25741292.2025.2574112 · Cited by 1
“…locally added: While Rose (1991, 1993, 2005) calls such adaptation hybridization or synthesis, it has been referred to in the literature by various names, such as assemblage (Prince 2010), adaptive learning (Giest 2017), bricolage (Stone 2020), and translation (Hassenteufel and Zeigermann 2021).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Prince, R.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169-186
- ISSN
- 0308-518X (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3409
- OpenAlex
- W2055187595
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 79.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.