The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transition Challenges for Alternative Fuel Vehicle and Transportation Systems
Abstract
Automakers are now developing alternatives to internal combustion engines (ICE), including hydrogen fuel cells and ICE-electric hybrids. Adoption dynamics for alternative vehicles are complex, owing to the size and importance of the auto industry and vehicle installed base. Diffusion of alternative vehicles is both enabled and constrained by powerful positive feedbacks arising from scale and scope economies, research and development, learning by doing, driver experience, word of mouth, and complementary resources such as fueling infrastructure. We describe a dynamic model of the diffusion of and competition among alternative fuel vehicles, including coevolution of the fleet technology, behavior, and complementary resources. Here we focus on the generation of consumer awareness of alternatives through feedback from consumers' experience, word of mouth, and marketing, with a reduced-form treatment of network effects and other positive feedbacks (which we treat in other papers). We demonstrate the existence of a critical threshold for sustained adoption of alternative technologies, and show how the threshold depends on economic and behavioral parameters. We show that word of mouth from those not driving an alternative vehicle is important in stimulating diffusion. Expanding the model boundary to include learning, technological spillovers, and spatial coevolution of fueling infrastructure adds additional feedbacks that condition the diffusion of alternative vehicles. Results show scenarios for successful diffusion of alternative vehicles, but also suggest that marketing programs and subsidies for alternatives must remain in place for long periods for diffusion to become self-sustaining.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233763 · Cited by 7,530
Cited by
The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption
Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.043 · Cited by 1,457
Sovacool, B. K., Axsen, J., & Sorrell, S. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.007 · Cited by 1,092
Total cost of ownership and its potential implications for battery electric vehicle diffusion
Hagman, J., Ritzén, S., Stier, J. J., & Susilo, Y. (2016) · Research in Transportation Business & Management · doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.01.003 · Cited by 293
A review of socio-technical energy transition (STET) models
Li, F. G. N., Trutnevyte, E., & Strachan, N. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.017 · Cited by 277
Autonomous electric vehicles can reduce carbon emissions and air pollution in cities
Ercan, T., Onat, N. C., Keya, N., Tatari, O., Eluru, N., & Kucukvar, M. (2022) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2022.103472 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Struben, J., & Sterman, J. D.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1070-1097
- ISSN
- 0265-8135 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3417
- OpenAlex
- W3125101717
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transition Challenges for Alternative Fuel Vehicle and Transportation Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/b33022t
- The paper
- Struben, J., & Sterman, J. D. (2008). Transition Challenges for Alternative Fuel Vehicle and Transportation Systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33022t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.