Why Retailers Cluster: An Agent Model of Location Choice on Supply Chains
Open accessAbstract
This paper investigates the emergence of retail clusters on supply chains comprised of suppliers, retailers, and consumers. An agent-based model is employed to study retail location choice in a market of homogeneous goods and a market of complementary goods. On a circle comprised of discrete locales, retailers play a noncooperative game by choosing locales to maximize profits which are impacted by their distance to consumers and to suppliers. Our findings disclose that in a market of homogeneous products symmetric distributions of retail clusters arise out of competition between individual retailers; average cluster density and cluster size change dynamically as retailers enter the market. In a market of two complementary goods, multiple equilibria of retail distributions are found to be common; a single cluster of retailers has the highest probability to emerge. Overall, our results show that retail clusters emerge from the balance between retailers' proximity to their customers, their competitors, their complements, and their suppliers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of existing studies focus on the economic principles underpinning clustering of land uses, ignoring the influence of urban morphology and associated human behaviour.
“The majority of existing studies focus on the economic principles underpinning this clustering, ignoring the influence of urban morphology and associated human behaviour (Huang and Levinson 2011;Ottaviano et al. 1998).”
From A Network Approach to Link Visibility and Urban Activity Location (2018) · cites this paper as Huang and Levinson 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Network Approach to Link Visibility and Urban Activity Location
Natapov, A., Czamanski, D., & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. (2018) · Networks and Spatial Economics · doi:10.1007/s11067-018-9411-4 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“The majority of existing studies focus on the economic principles underpinning this clustering, ignoring the influence of urban morphology and associated human behaviour (Huang and Levinson 2011; Ottaviano et al. 1998).”
Background
- Authors
- Huang, A., & Levinson, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Arthur
- Levinson, David
- Venue
- Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 82-94
- ISSN
- 0265-8135 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3417
- OpenAlex
- W2109564576
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- purl.umn.edu
- Locations
- Environment and Planning B Planning and Design (publishedVersion)
- University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Transportation Research Board 89th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
- Keywords
- retail clusters, store location selection, supply chain, agent-based modeling, non-cooperative game, homogeneous goods, complementary products, multiple equilibria, cluster density, cluster size, retail competition, supplier-retailer relationship, spatial competition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review