The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Towards an Understanding of the Gender Division of Urban Space
Abstract
The paper contains a critical review of urban theory and of some current work in urban studies on ‘women's issues’. It is argued that the nature of the changing interrelationships between production and reproduction, as part of a single inseparable process that varies across space and over time, should be the key focus for a feminist urban studies. Ways in which an understanding of these changing relationships can add to the analysis of housing policy in postwar Britain are outlined. The principal aim of the paper is advocacy, and the plea is for feminist theory and feminist analysis. It is beginning to be accepted that urban studies, by ignoring gender divisions, is neglecting an important structuring element of urban space and urban processes. Recognition of the significance of gender divisions, however, must not lead to an insistence on analysis focusing solely on women and women's behaviour. Thus the object of feminist research should not be women alone, but rather the structure of social relations that contributes to female oppression, this involving confrontation with the theoretical issues raised by an analysis of patriarchy (a term used here to refer to temporally and spatially specific relations between men and women, rather than to the oppression of all women in all forms of society). Despite the advances already made in integrating women's lives into urban studies, a large number of the studies about women and the urban environment are ultimately unsatisfactory. Their foci stop short at the description and analysis of women's behaviour only. However, this is not to denigrate the very real function they serve in bringing gender differences to the research forefront. After a review of the literature on gender differences in the organisation, use, and conception of urban space, a more specific focus for a feminist urban studies is outlined, with an example of how this might be applied to the historical analysis of postwar housing policy in Britain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Doing Gender: Feminism, Feminists and Research Methods in Human Geography
McDowell, L. (1992) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.2307/622707 · Cited by 668
Self-citationNast, H. J. (1994) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00054.x · Cited by 488
The constitution of the home: Towards a research agenda
Saunders, P., & Williams, P. (1988) · Housing Studies · doi:10.1080/02673038808720618 · Cited by 320
Urbanizing social reproduction: (Re)thinking the politics of care in capitalist urban development
Miraftab, F., & Huq, E. (2024) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1177/02637758241230179 · Cited by 21
Using Feminist Geography to Understand Feelings of Safety and Neighborhood Image
Zavattaro, S. (2019) · Journal of Health and Human Services Administration · doi:10.1177/107937391904200202 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- McDowell, L.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1983-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-72
- ISSN
- 0263-7758 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3433
- OpenAlex
- W2141719790
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards an Understanding of the Gender Division of Urban Space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/d010059
- The paper
- McDowell, L. (1983). Towards an Understanding of the Gender Division of Urban Space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. https://doi.org/10.1068/d010059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.