Cited by 23Foucault, Power, and EthicsPolitical Theology and SovereigntyDecolonial Thought and Epistemologies

Towards a Global Genealogy of Biopolitics: Race, Colonialism, and Biometrics beyond Europe

Nishiyama, Hidefumi·2015·Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

Abstract

This paper examines, at the global scale, the biopolitical strategy of racism that Foucault articulated in the context of 19th-century Europe. Through my historical analysis both of the emergent notion of race and of biometric production of racial knowledge during Japanese colonialism, I endeavour to delineate a circulation of a political rationality of modern racism, which became globally generalised and constitutive of the formation of a non-Western nation-state. I argue that this emergence of global biopolitics, however, should not simply be reduced to a unitary operation but needs to be understood as the process of multiplication that reveals both the continuity and the contingency of the biopolitical strategy of racism in relation to particular spatiotemporal configurations. Furthermore, through an archaeological reading of Foucault on modern racism, I will suggest that Foucault's Society Must be Defended, albeit arguably underdeveloped in its geographical scope of analysis, can shed light on the operation of biopolitics and modern racism beyond the history of Europe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/d19912

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The origins of biometric identification lie in practices of colonial control, where biometric surveillance was imposed on colonized peoples while white settlers often exempted themselves.

    “The very origins of biometric identification lie in the practices of colonial control (Nishiyama 2015), where biometric surveillance was imposed on colonized peoples, while white settlers often exempted themselves, reflecting a racial double-standard that surveillance is for the subjugated.”

Cited by

Authors
Nishiyama, H.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Nishiyama, Hidefumi
Venue
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
Published
2015-04
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
331-346
ISSN
  • 0263-7758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-3433
OpenAlex
W2073674729
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environment and Planning D Society and Space (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Theology and Sovereignty
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
Keywords
biopolitics, racism, colonialism, biometrics, race, Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended, Japanese colonial rule, world history, racial knowledge, archaeology of power

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review