The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performativity and the Event: Enacting a Philosophy of Difference
Abstract
What is performativity? In this paper I set out to encounter this question by intimating the directions we are forced to consider when thinking through the performative. In centring my arguments within the corpus of Deleuze's philosophy of difference I advocate academic production as creative of thought. This is to suggest a performative thinking and doing that unfolds our way of looking at our social, corporeal, human dramas and the technologies by which we feel able to analyse something, and in so doing, enact its constitution. Coursing underneath this issue of performativity is the problematisation of the term of the subject—what if the event was more important? What do we understand of the event if not through a sense of subjectivity? Insinuated within the confrontation with performativity are fundamental implications associated with the timing of something as it happens, the centrality of the material and visceral body to this, and the settings through which events take place. Arguing through this triality I extract three symptomatic themes of performativity: that it speaks of irretrievability, indeterminacy, and excess. Ethically, and in conclusion, emphasis is placed on the empiricism of life in its doing—the present moment of immediate uncertain happening as we are continually enacted out of ‘knowing’ how to go on within concrete, material circumstances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deterritorializations: The Rewriting of Home and Exile in Western Feminist Discourse
Kaplan, C. (1987) · Cultural Critique · doi:10.2307/1354261 · Cited by 232 · cited 1×
“Equally, as Deleuze and Guattari themselves warn, `̀ don't blow apart the strata without taking precautions'' (Deleuze and Guattari, 1988, page 160) for there is `̀ no invention without a commensurate dose of instability'' (Massumi, 1992, page 85; see also Kaplan, 1993).”
Background
Cited by
Becoming and Being Hopeful: Towards a Theory of Affect
Anderson, B. (2006) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d393t · Cited by 787
Lorimer, J. (2007) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d71j · Cited by 719
Making connections and thinking through emotions: between geography and psychotherapy
Bondi, L. (2005) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00183.x · Cited by 592
An event of geographical ethics in spaces of affect
McCormack, D. P. (2003) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.0020-2754.2003.00106.x · Cited by 494
Moving cities: rethinking the materialities of urban geographies
Latham, A., & McCormack, D. P. (2004) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/0309132504ph515oa · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Dewsbury, J.-D.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 473-496
- ISSN
- 0263-7758 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3433
- OpenAlex
- W2056746628
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 133.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performativity and the Event: Enacting a Philosophy of Difference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/d200t
- The paper
- Dewsbury, J.-D. (2000). Performativity and the Event: Enacting a Philosophy of Difference. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. https://doi.org/10.1068/d200t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.