The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Afterwords
Abstract
Gradually, then, it has become clear to me what I am trying to do. I want to provide a body of work which values creative praxis. This will not be easy as—with a few exceptions—most academics nowadays still tend towards impoverished views of praxis which leave remarkably little room for creative exorbitance. Thus, for example, many modern social and cultural theorists would find it difficult to understand the import of Wittgenstein's famous question, “what remains over from the fact that I raise my arm when I subtract the fact that my arm goes up?” In effect, what I attempt to provide is the beginnings of an answer to this question. In the first part of the paper I am therefore concerned with an account of a style of thinking which I call nonrepresentationalist. In the second part of the paper I then broaden the discourse by considering the ways in which this style of work might be linked to other developments in the social sciences and humanities grouped around the notion and the motion of performance. In the third part I consider one particular mode of performance—dance—as illustration of some of the steps I have traced out. Some tentative conclusions follow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Art And Agency: An Anthropological Theory
Gell, A. (1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198280132.001.0001 · Cited by 3,460
Cited by
Becoming and Being Hopeful: Towards a Theory of Affect
Anderson, B. (2006) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d393t · Cited by 787
Lorimer, J. (2007) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d71j · Cited by 719
Secondhandedness: Consumption, Disposal, and Absent Presence
Hetherington, K. (2004) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d315t · Cited by 548
Affective spaces, melancholic objects: ruination and the production of anthropological knowledge*
Navaro‐Yashin, Y. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.01527.x · Cited by 494
An event of geographical ethics in spaces of affect
McCormack, D. P. (2003) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.0020-2754.2003.00106.x · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Thrift, N.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 213-255
- ISSN
- 0263-7758 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3433
- OpenAlex
- W4211043663
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 457.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Afterwords. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/d214t
- The paper
- Thrift, N. (2000). Afterwords. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. https://doi.org/10.1068/d214t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.