The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Action Categories and the Perception of Biological Motion
Abstract
Johansson filmed walkers and runners in a dark room with lights attached to their main joints and demonstrated that such moving light spots were perceived as human movements. To extend this finding the detection and recognition of Johansson displays of different kinds of movements under three light-spot conditions were studied to determine how human actions are perceived on the basis of biological-motion information. Locomotory, instrumental, and social actions were presented in each condition, namely in normal Johansson (light attached to joints), inter-joint (light attached between joints), and upside-down Johansson. Subjects' verbal responses and recognition times were measured. Locomotory actions were recognised better and faster than social and instrumental actions. Furthermore, biological motions were recognised much better and faster when the light-spot displays were presented in the normal orientation rather than upside down. Recognition rate was only slightly impaired under the inter-joint condition. It is argued that the perceptual analysis of actions and movements starts primarily on an intermediate level of action coding and comprises more than just the similarity of movement patterns or simple structures. Additionally, coding of dynamic phase relations and semantic coding take place at very early stages of the processing of biological motion. Implications of these results for computer vision, perceptual models, and mental representations are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416950 · Cited by 3,340
Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression.
Bassili, J. N. (1978) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.4.3.373 · Cited by 369
Cited by
Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns
Troje, N. F. (2002) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/2.5.2 · Cited by 1,016
Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements
Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1057 · Cited by 955
Emotion Perception from Dynamic and Static Body Expressions in Point-Light and Full-Light Displays
Atkinson, A. P., Dittrich, W. H., Gemmell, A. J., & Young, A. W. (2004) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p5096 · Cited by 785
Self-citationElectrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion
Puce, A., & Perrett, D. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1221 · Cited by 693
Tardigrades survive exposure to space in low Earth orbit
Jönsson, K. I., Rabbow, E., Schill, R. O., Harms-Ringdahl, M., & Rettberg, P. (2008) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.048 · Cited by 415
Metadata
- Authors
- Dittrich, W. H.
- Venue
- Perception
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-22
- ISSN
- 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4233
- OpenAlex
- W2070537072
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Action Categories and the Perception of Biological Motion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/p220015
- The paper
- Dittrich, W. H. (1993). Action Categories and the Perception of Biological Motion. Perception. https://doi.org/10.1068/p220015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.