The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perception of Emotion from Dynamic Point-Light Displays Represented in Dance
Abstract
It is well known that biological motion, as produced by point-light displays on a human body, gives a good representation of the represented body—eg its gender and the nature of the task which it is engaged in. The question is whether it is possible to judge the emotional state of a human body from motion information alone. An ability to make this kind of judgment may imply that people are able to perceive emotion from patterns of movement without having to compute the detailed shape first. Subjects were shown brief video clips of two trained dancers (one male, one female). The dancers were aiming to convey the following emotions: fear, anger, grief, joy, surprise, and disgust. The video clips protrayed fully lit scenes and point-light scenes, with thirteen small points of light attached to the body of each dancer. Half the stimuli were presented the right way up, while half were inverted. The subjects' task was to judge which emotion was being portrayed. Full-body clips gave good recognition of emotionality (88% correct), but the results for upright biological-motion displays were also significantly above chance (63% correct). Inversion of the display reduced biological-motion (but not full-body) performance to close to chance but still significantly above chance. A space–time analysis of the motion of the points of light was carried out, and was related to the discriminability of the different emotions. Biological-motion displays, which convey no information while static, are able to give a rich description of the subject matter, including the ability to judge emotional state. This ability is disrupted when the image is inverted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/372669a0 · Cited by 2,360
Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression.
Bassili, J. N. (1978) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.4.3.373 · Cited by 369
Cited by
Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour
Adolphs, R. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1056 · Cited by 1,657
Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements
Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1057 · Cited by 955
The enactive mind, or from actions to cognition: lessons from autism
Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., & Volkmar, F. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1202 · Cited by 890
Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language
de Gelder, B. (2006) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1872 · Cited by 786
Perceiving affect from arm movement
Pollick, F. E., Paterson, H. M., Bruderlin, A., & Sanford, A. J. (2001) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00147-0 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Dittrich, W. H., Troscianko, T., Lea, S. E. G., & Morgan, D.
- Venue
- Perception
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 727-738
- ISSN
- 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4233
- OpenAlex
- W1968811590
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perception of Emotion from Dynamic Point-Light Displays Represented in Dance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/p250727
- The paper
- Dittrich, W. H., Troscianko, T., Lea, S. E. G., & Morgan, D. (1996). Perception of Emotion from Dynamic Point-Light Displays Represented in Dance. Perception. https://doi.org/10.1068/p250727
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.