The DOI matches its Crossref record.
General practice in Australia 2000
Open accessAbstract
Visiting Professor, University of New South Wales
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Buykx, P., Humphreys, J., Wakerman, J., & Pashen, D. (2010) · Australian Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1584.2010.01139.x · Cited by 358
Defining chronic conditions for primary care with ICPC-2
O'Halloran, J., Miller, G. C., & Britt, H. (2004) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmh407 · Cited by 334
Reducing the health disparities of Indigenous Australians: time to change focus
Durey, A., & Thompson, S. C. (2012) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-151 · Cited by 319
The general practice care of people with intellectual disability: barriers and solutions
Lennox, N. G., Diggens, J. N., & Ugoni, A. M. (1997) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.1997.tb00725.x · Cited by 265
Blackberry, I. D., Furler, J. S., Best, J. D., Chondros, P., Vale, M., Walker, C., Dunning, T., Segal, L., Dunbar, J., Audehm, R., et al. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f5272 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Hindle, D.
- Venue
- Australian Health Review
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 201-206
- ISSN
- 0156-5788 (ISSN-L)
- 1449-8944
- OpenAlex
- W2011120499
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: General practice in Australia 2000. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/ah010201
- The paper
- Hindle, D. (2001). General practice in Australia 2000. Australian Health Review. https://doi.org/10.1071/ah010201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
