The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive?
Abstract
This presentation is a concept review paper dealing with a central dilemma in understanding, designing, and acting upon crop plant improvement programs for drought conditions. The association among yield potential (YP), drought resistance (DR), and water-use efficiency (WUE) is often misunderstood, which in turn can lead to conceptual oversight and wrong decisions in implementing breeding programs for drought-prone environments. Although high YP is the target of most crop breeding programs, it might not be compatible with superior DR. On the other hand, high YP can contribute to yield in moderate stress environments. Plant production in water-limited environments is very often affected by constitutive plant traits that allow maintenance of a high plant water status (dehydration avoidance). Osmotic adjustment (OA) is a major cellular stress adaptive response in certain crop plants that enhances dehydration avoidance and supports yield under stress. Despite past voiced speculations, there is no proof that OA entails a cost in terms of reduced YP. WUE for yield is often equated in a simplistic manner with DR. The large accumulation of knowledge on crop WUE as derived from research on carbon isotope discrimination allows some conclusions on the relations between WUE on the one hand, and DR and YP on the other, to be made. Briefly, apparent genotypic variations in WUE are normally expressed mainly due to variations in water use (WU; the denominator). Reduced WU, which is reflected in higher WUE, is generally achieved by plant traits and environmental responses that reduce YP. Improved WUE on the basis of reduced WU is expressed in improved yield under water-limited conditions only when there is need to balance crop water use against a limited and known soil moisture reserve. However, under most dryland situations where crops depend on unpredictable seasonal rainfall, the maximisation of soil moisture use is a crucial component of drought resistance (avoidance), which is generally expressed in lower WUE. It is concluded that the effect of a single ‘drought adaptive’ gene on crop performance in water-limited environments can be assessed only when the whole system is considered in terms of YP, DR, and WUE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant Breeding for Stress Environments
Blum, A. (2018) · doi:10.1201/9781351075718 · Cited by 1,309 · cited 2×
“…characterised by the maintenance of high plant water status under stress, can present, for example, any of the following features: early flowering, smaller plant, small leaf area, or limited tillering (in cereals) (e.g. Blum 1988), all of which are in contrast to a high yield potential phenotype.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Quantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?: Table I.
Collins, N. C., Tardieu, F., & Tuberosa, R. (2008) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.108.118117 · Cited by 559
Leakey, A. D. B., Ferguson, J. N., Pignon, C. P., Wu, A., Jin, Z., Hammer, G. L., & Lobell, D. B. (2019) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040305 · Cited by 372
Hadebe, S. T., Modi, A. T., & Mabhaudhi, T. (2017) · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science · doi:10.1111/jac.12191 · Cited by 359
Advances in mechanisms of drought tolerance in crops, with emphasis on barley
Kebede, A., Kang, M. S., & Bekele, E. (2019) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2019.01.008 · Cited by 79
Mahalingam, R., Duhan, N., Kaundal, R., Smertenko, A., Nazarov, T., & Bregitzer, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.1066421 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Blum, A.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2005-11-29
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1159-1168
- ISSN
- 0004-9409 (ISSN-L)
- 1444-9838
- OpenAlex
- W2154232438
- Cited by
- 1,477
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/ar05069
- The paper
- Blum, A. (2005). Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/ar05069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.