The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme
Abstract
The adaptation of barley varieties was studied by the use of grain yields of a randomly chosen group of 277 varieties from a world collection, grown in replicated trials for several seasons at three sites in South Australia. For each variety a linear regression of yield on the mean yield of all varieties for each site and season was computed to measure variety adaptation. In these calculations the basic yields were measured on a logarithmic scale, as it was found that a high degree of linearity was thereby induced. The mean yield of all varieties for each site and season provided a quantitative grading of the environments; and from the analysis described, varieties specifically adapted to good or poor seasons and those showing general adaptability may be identified. The study of the adaptation of the whole population of varieties was facilitated by the use of a two-dimensional plot (scatter diagram), with mean yield and regression coefficient as coordinates for each variety. Though wide variation was evident in both mean yield and sensitivity to environment as characterized by the regression coefficient, the variation in sensitivity was proportionately less among varieties with higher mean yield, and the varieties with highest mean yield exhibited, within very narrow limits (regression coefficients close to 0.8), a similar degree of adaptation to all environments over the wide range, especially of seasonal conditions, typical of the South Australian cereal belt. Varieties from particular geographic regions of the world showed a similarity in type of adaptation, which provides a useful basis for plant introduction. Phenotypic stability and physiological and morphological characteristics of groups of varieties with specific or general adaptability are discussed in relation to plant introduction and breeding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss—Newton method
WEDDERBURN, R. W. M. (1974) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/61.3.439 · Cited by 2,122
Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: What should we breed for?
ARAUS, J. L. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf049 · Cited by 1,243
SMITH, A. B., CULLIS, B. R., & THOMPSON, R. (2005) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859605005587 · Cited by 623
Smith, A., Cullis, B., & Thompson, R. (2001) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.01138.x · Cited by 566
Malosetti, M., Ribaut, J.-M., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00044 · Cited by 539
Metadata
- Authors
- Finlay, K., & Wilkinson, G.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1963-12-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 742-754
- ISSN
- 0004-9409 (ISSN-L)
- 1444-9838
- OpenAlex
- W1986037157
- Cited by
- 3,165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/ar9630742
- The paper
- Finlay, K., & Wilkinson, G. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/ar9630742
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.