Cited by 50Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesGamma-ray bursts and supernovae

The Chemical Evolution of Magnesium Isotopic Abundances in the Solar Neighbourhood

Open access
Fenner, Y., Gibson, B. K., Lee, H.-c., Karakas, A. I., Lattanzio, J. C., Chieffi, A., Limongi, M., Yong, D.·2003·Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia

Abstract

Abstract The abundance of the neutron-rich magnesium isotopes observed in metal-poor stars is explained quantitatively with a chemical evolution model of the local Galaxy that considers — for the first time — the metallicity-dependent contribution from intermediate mass stars. Previous models that simulate the variation of Mg isotopic ratios with metallicity in the solar neighbourhood have attributed the production of 25Mg and 26Mg exclusively to hydrostatic burning in massive stars. These models match the data well for [Fe/H] > –1.0 but severely underestimate 25,26Mg/24Mg at lower metallicities. Earlier studies have noted that this discrepancy may indicate a significant role played by intermediate mass stars. Only recently have detailed calculations of intermediate mass stellar yields of 25Mg and 26Mg become available with which to test this hypothesis. In an extension of previous work, we present a model that successfully matches the Mg isotopic abundances in nearby Galactic disk stars through the incorporation of nucleosynthesis predictions of Mg isotopic production in asymptotic giant branch stars.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/as03042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fenner et al. (2003) found that the contribution of AGB stars was essential to explain the Mg isotopic ratios observed in cool evolved field stars.

    “Fenner et al. (2003) found that the contribution of AGB stars was essential to explain the Mg isotopic ratios observed in cool evolved field stars (Gay & Lambert 2000; Yong et al. 2003b).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fenner, Y., Gibson, B. K., Lee, H.-C., Karakas, A. I., Lattanzio, J. C., Chieffi, A., Limongi, M., & Yong, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Astronomical Observatory of Rome (IT)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Fenner, Y.
Venue
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
Published
2003
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
340-344
ISSN
  • 1323-3580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-6083
OpenAlex
W2169857182
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Keywords
magnesium isotopes, 25Mg, 26Mg, 24Mg, neutron-rich nuclei, chemical evolution, metal-poor stars, intermediate-mass stars, asymptotic giant branch, stellar nucleosynthesis, stellar yields, Galactic disk, solar neighborhood, metallicity dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review