Cited by 31Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesNuclear physics research studiesAstro and Planetary Science

Nucleosynthesis of Light-Element Isotopes in Evolved Stars Experiencing Extended Mixing

Open access
Palmerini, S., Busso, M., Maiorca, E., Guandalini, R.·2009·Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia

Abstract

We present computations of nucleosynthesis in red giants and Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) stars of Population I experiencing extended mixing. The assumed physical cause for mass transport is the buoyancy of magnetized structures, according to recent suggestions. The peculiar property of such a mechanism is to allow for both fast and slow mixing phenomena, as required for reproducing the spread in Li abundances displayed by red giants and as discussed in an accompanying paper. We explore here the effects of this kind of mass transport on CNO and intermediate-mass nuclei and compare the results with the available evidence from evolved red giants and from the isotopic composition of presolar grains of AGB origin. It is found that a good general accord exists between predictions and measurements; in this framework we also show which type of observational data best constrains the various parameters. We conclude that magnetic buoyancy, allowing for mixing at rather different speeds, can be an interesting scenario to explore for explaining together the abundances of CNO nuclei and of Li.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/as08040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evidence for deep mixing on the AGB comes mainly from O and Al isotope ratios measured in pre-solar oxide grains, which support the existence of extra mixing in low-mass (M ≲ 1.3 M⊙) AGB stars.

    “The evidence for deep mixing on the AGB comes mainly from O and Al isotope ratios measured in pre-solar oxide grains, which support the existence of such extra mixing in low-mass ( M ≲ 1 . 3 M ⊙ ) AGB stars (Busso et al. 2010; Palmerini et al. 2009, 2011).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palmerini, S., Busso, M., Maiorca, E., & Guandalini, R.
Affiliations
University of Perugia (IT)
Corresponding author
Palmerini, S.
Venue
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
Published
2009
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
161-167
ISSN
  • 1323-3580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-6083
OpenAlex
W2005865955
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Nuclear Physics
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
nucleosynthesis, red giants, asymptotic giant branch stars, Population I stars, magnetic buoyancy, mass transfer, lithium abundance, medium-mass nuclei, presolar grains, stellar evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review