The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impacts of ecosystem fragmentation on plant populations: generalising the idiosyncratic
Abstract
Fragmentation of natural vegetation is one of the most pervasive changes in terrestrial ecosystems across the Earth. Developing a general understanding of how fragmentation affects plant and animal populations is essential to meet the pressing need for guidelines for the management of fragmented systems. Nevertheless, this general understanding has to take account of differences in ecosystem types and different biogeographic, evolutionary and ecological backgrounds against which fragmentation impacts are played out in different parts of the world. Here, we examine fragmentation impacts on plant populations by considering the processes underlying fragmentation. We suggest that it is critical to focus on the key processes that are important in particular situations, rather than assuming that the same factors are likely to be important everywhere. In other words, there are inevitable limits to generalisation because of the idiosyncratic nature of the geography, history and biota of different regions. Studies on the effects of fragmentation on plant populations have focused on a limited subset of plant types and have concentrated heavily on reproductive output rather than actual regeneration success. These studies have indicated a clear impact of fragmentation on fecundity, but there is no clear signal in terms of the actual importance of this in relation to population viability. Other factors including local habitat conditions, disturbance and competition from weeds may be just as important as the classical biogeographical impacts of fragmentation. Generalisations based on a clear assessment of key life-history processes may be valuable tools in developing management responses to ecosystem fragmentation, but this requires considerably more emphasis on factors affecting successful recruitment as well as factors affecting fecundity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Directions in Conservation Biology
Caughley, G. (1994) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5542 · Cited by 2,405
Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown?
Simberloff, D., & Von Holle, B. (1999) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1023/a:1010086329619 · Cited by 2,231
The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants
Young, A., Boyle, T., & Brown, T. (1996) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)10045-8 · Cited by 2,113
Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects
McGarigal, K., & Cushman, S. A. (2002) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0335:ceoeat]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 731
Cited by
Aguilar, R., Ashworth, L., Galetto, L., & Aizen, M. A. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00927.x · Cited by 1,079
What's new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly
CRAMER, V, HOBBS, R., & STANDISH, R. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.005 · Cited by 890
Self-citationHopper, S. D., & Gioia, P. (2004) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130201 · Cited by 831
Rethinking the conceptual foundations of habitat fragmentation research
Didham, R. K., Kapos, V., & Ewers, R. M. (2012) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20273.x · Cited by 377
Santos, B. A., Peres, C. A., Oliveira, M. A., Grillo, A., Alves-Costa, C. P., & Tabarelli, M. (2008) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.09.018 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Hobbs, R. J., & Yates, C. J.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2003-09-26
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 471-488
- ISSN
- 0067-1924 (ISSN-L)
- 1444-9862
- OpenAlex
- W1963405395
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impacts of ecosystem fragmentation on plant populations: generalising the idiosyncratic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/bt03037
- The paper
- Hobbs, R. J., & Yates, C. J. (2003). Impacts of ecosystem fragmentation on plant populations: generalising the idiosyncratic. Australian Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1071/bt03037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.