The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prediction of Dispersion Forces: Is There a Problem?
Abstract
We discuss the ability of a number of standard and non-standard computational techniques to reproduce dispersion forces, using examples from the literature as well as some new examples. We conclude that there are still some cases where standard methods are not so far successful. There are some promising directions under study, however. Manuscript received: 15 March 2001 Final version: 26 October 2001.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections
Chai, J.-D., & Head-Gordon, M. (2008) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b810189b · Cited by 14,648
Bučko, T., Hafner, J., Lebègue, S., & Ángyán, J. G. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp106469x · Cited by 1,121
Random-phase approximation and its applications in computational chemistry and materials science
Ren, X., Rinke, P., Joas, C., & Scheffler, M. (2012) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-012-6570-4 · Cited by 610
Metadata
- Authors
- Dobson, J. F., McLennan, K., Rubio, A., Wang, J., Gould, T., Le, H. M., & Dinte, B. P.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Chemistry
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2002-02-04
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 513-527
- ISSN
- 0004-9425 (ISSN-L)
- 1445-0038
- OpenAlex
- W2157786165
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Dispersion Forces: Is There a Problem? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/ch01052
- The paper
- Dobson, J. F., McLennan, K., Rubio, A., Wang, J., Gould, T., Le, H. M., & Dinte, B. P. (2002). Prediction of Dispersion Forces: Is There a Problem? Australian Journal of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1071/ch01052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
