Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bringing Efficiency to Materials Synthesis: The Philosophy of Click Chemistry

Hawker, Craig J., Fokin, Valery V., Finn, M. G., Sharpless, K. Barry·2007·Australian Journal of Chemistry

Abstract

We open this Essay by paying homage to Sir John Cornforth, who was inspirational to the establishment of click chemistry as one of the most rapidly growing areas of research in materials synthesis. In two distinct ways, the influence of this giant of 20th century chemistry was of fundamental and practical importance. First, the philosophy of Professor Cornforth permeates modern materials chemistry. Cornforth saw himself as a molder of basic building blocks, ‘As a carpenter or carver learns to work with the grain of wood or bone, I learned that each substance has its own nature and can be easy or difficult to handle according to the procedure chosen’.[1] In addition, Cornforth appreciated the goal of efficiency in chemical synthesis, ‘The ideal chemical process is that which a one-armed operator can perform by pouring the reactants into a bath tub and collecting pure product from the drain hole’. Modularity and efficiency are inherent in polymer synthesis, but the explicit appreciation by Cornforth of the importance of both in the preparation of complex, multifunctional systems helped to inaugurate an important era of modern materials chemistry. Second, in 2002 the inaugural Cornforth Symposium was held at the University of Sydney and two of us (Sharpless and Hawker) were honored to be the inaugural lecturers. While polymer chemistry was recognized from the first as an important inspiration for (and potential beneficiary of) the click concept,[2] it was during the symposium and surrounding discussions that the real promise of click chemistry in materials synthesis first began to be appreciated. Initial scribbling of possible research directions quickly became firm outlines of a series of collaborative studies between the Scripps groups and the Hawker group, and these studies helped to lay the foundation for the exploitation of azide/alkyne coupling as a valuable new synthetic technique in synthetic chemistry. A two-way exchange

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/ch07107

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Hawker, C. J., Fokin, V. V., Finn, M. G., & Sharpless, K. B.
Venue
Australian Journal of Chemistry
Published
2007-06-18
Volume
60
Issue
6
Pages
381-383
ISSN
  • 0004-9425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1445-0038
OpenAlex
W1997222584
Cited by
167
References
1
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bringing Efficiency to Materials Synthesis: The Philosophy of Click Chemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/ch07107
The paper
Hawker, C. J., Fokin, V. V., Finn, M. G., & Sharpless, K. B. (2007). Bringing Efficiency to Materials Synthesis: The Philosophy of Click Chemistry. Australian Journal of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1071/ch07107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.