The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bringing Efficiency to Materials Synthesis: The Philosophy of Click Chemistry
Abstract
We open this Essay by paying homage to Sir John Cornforth, who was inspirational to the establishment of click chemistry as one of the most rapidly growing areas of research in materials synthesis. In two distinct ways, the influence of this giant of 20th century chemistry was of fundamental and practical importance. First, the philosophy of Professor Cornforth permeates modern materials chemistry. Cornforth saw himself as a molder of basic building blocks, ‘As a carpenter or carver learns to work with the grain of wood or bone, I learned that each substance has its own nature and can be easy or difficult to handle according to the procedure chosen’.[1] In addition, Cornforth appreciated the goal of efficiency in chemical synthesis, ‘The ideal chemical process is that which a one-armed operator can perform by pouring the reactants into a bath tub and collecting pure product from the drain hole’. Modularity and efficiency are inherent in polymer synthesis, but the explicit appreciation by Cornforth of the importance of both in the preparation of complex, multifunctional systems helped to inaugurate an important era of modern materials chemistry. Second, in 2002 the inaugural Cornforth Symposium was held at the University of Sydney and two of us (Sharpless and Hawker) were honored to be the inaugural lecturers. While polymer chemistry was recognized from the first as an important inspiration for (and potential beneficiary of) the click concept,[2] it was during the symposium and surrounding discussions that the real promise of click chemistry in materials synthesis first began to be appreciated. Initial scribbling of possible research directions quickly became firm outlines of a series of collaborative studies between the Scripps groups and the Hawker group, and these studies helped to lay the foundation for the exploitation of azide/alkyne coupling as a valuable new synthetic technique in synthetic chemistry. A two-way exchange
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tornøe, C. W., Christensen, C., & Meldal, M. (2002) · The Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jo011148j · Cited by 8,696
Cited by
The power of thiol‐ene chemistry
Kade, M. J., Burke, D. J., & Hawker, C. J. (2010) · Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1002/pola.23824 · Cited by 853
Self-citation“Clicking” Polymers or Just Efficient Linking: What Is the Difference?
Barner‐Kowollik, C., Du Prez, F. E., Espeel, P., Hawker, C. J., Junkers, T., Schlaad, H., & Van Camp, W. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201003707 · Cited by 632
Self-citationLutz, J.-F., & Zarafshani, Z. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2008.02.004 · Cited by 549
Copper(I)‐Catalyzed Cycloaddition of Organic Azides and 1‐Iodoalkynes
Hein, J. E., Tripp, J. C., Krasnova, L. B., Sharpless, K. B., & Fokin, V. V. (2009) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200903558 · Cited by 478
Self-citationGregory, A., & Stenzel, M. H. (2012) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.08.004 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawker, C. J., Fokin, V. V., Finn, M. G., & Sharpless, K. B.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Chemistry
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2007-06-18
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 381-383
- ISSN
- 0004-9425 (ISSN-L)
- 1445-0038
- OpenAlex
- W1997222584
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bringing Efficiency to Materials Synthesis: The Philosophy of Click Chemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/ch07107
- The paper
- Hawker, C. J., Fokin, V. V., Finn, M. G., & Sharpless, K. B. (2007). Bringing Efficiency to Materials Synthesis: The Philosophy of Click Chemistry. Australian Journal of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1071/ch07107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.