The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Directional Weak Intermolecular Interactions: σ-Hole Bonding
Abstract
The prototypical directional weak interactions, hydrogen bonding and σ-hole bonding (including the special case of halogen bonding) are reviewed in a united picture that depends on the anisotropic nature of the molecular electrostatic potential around the donor atom. Qualitative descriptions of the effects that lead to these anisotropic distributions are given and examples of the importance of σ-hole bonding in crystal engineering and biological systems are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Bright Future of Unconventional σ/π‐Hole Interactions
Bauzá, A., Mooibroek, T. J., & Frontera, A. (2015) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201500314 · Cited by 710
A quantum mechanics-based halogen bonding scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.
Yang, Z., Liu, Y., Chen, Z., Xu, Z., Shi, J., Chen, K., & Zhu, W. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-015-2681-6 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Murray, J. S., Riley, K. E., Politzer, P., & Clark, T.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Chemistry
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2010-12-06
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1598-1607
- ISSN
- 0004-9425 (ISSN-L)
- 1445-0038
- OpenAlex
- W2094294679
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Directional Weak Intermolecular Interactions: σ-Hole Bonding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/ch10259
- The paper
- Murray, J. S., Riley, K. E., Politzer, P., & Clark, T. (2010). Directional Weak Intermolecular Interactions: σ-Hole Bonding. Australian Journal of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1071/ch10259
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
