The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nutritional constraints on root nodule bacteria affecting symbiotic nitrogen fixation: a review
Abstract
Root nodule bacteria require access to adequate concentrations of mineral nutrients for metabolic processes to enable their survival and growth as free-living soil saprophytes, and in their symbiotic relationship with legumes. Essential nutrients, with a direct requirement in metabolism of rhizobia are carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, manganese, copper, zinc, molybdenum, nickel, cobalt and selenium. Boron does not seem to be required by rhizobia, but is essential for the establishment of effective legume symbioses. Nutrient constraints can affect both free-living and symbiotic forms of root nodule bacteria, but whether they do is a function of a complex series of events and interactions. Important physiological characteristics of rhizobia involved in, or affected by, their mineral nutrition include nutrient uptake, growth rate, gene regulation, nutrient storage, survival, genetic exchange and the viable non-culturable state. There is considerable variation between genera, species and strains of rhizobia in their response to nutrient deficiency. The effects of nutrient deficiencies on free-living rhizobia in the soil are poorly understood. Competition between strains of rhizobia for limiting phosphorus and iron in the rhizosphere may affect their ability to nodulate legumes. Processes in the development of some legume symbioses specifically require calcium, cobalt, copper, iron, potassium, molybdenum, nickel, phosphorus, selenium, zinc and boron. Limitations of phosphorus, calcium, iron and molybdenum in particular, can reduce legume productivity by affecting nodule development and function. The effects of nutrient deficiencies on rhizobia–legume signalling are not understood. The supply of essential inorganic nutrients to bacteroids in relation to nutrient partitioning in nodule tissues and nutrient transport to the symbiosome may affect effectiveness of nitrogen fixation. An integration of molecular approaches with more traditional biochemical, physiological and field-based studies is needed to improve understanding of the agricultural importance of rhizobia response to nutrient stress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soil microbial inoculants for sustainable agriculture: Limitations and opportunities
O'Callaghan, M., Ballard, R. A., & Wright, D. (2022) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.12811 · Cited by 489
Legume nodulation: The host controls the party
Ferguson, B. J., Mens, C., Hastwell, A. H., Zhang, M., Su, H., Jones, C. H., Chu, X., & Gresshoff, P. M. (2019) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.13348 · Cited by 406
Heavy Metals in Crop Plants: Transport and Redistribution Processes on the Whole Plant Level
Page, V., & Feller, U. (2015) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy5030447 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Hara, G. W.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2001-05-18
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 417-433
- ISSN
- 0816-1089 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-5574
- OpenAlex
- W1829358604
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutritional constraints on root nodule bacteria affecting symbiotic nitrogen fixation: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/ea00087
- The paper
- O'Hara, G. W. (2001). Nutritional constraints on root nodule bacteria affecting symbiotic nitrogen fixation: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1071/ea00087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.