Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nutritional constraints on root nodule bacteria affecting symbiotic nitrogen fixation: a review

O'Hara, G. W.·2001·Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Abstract

Root nodule bacteria require access to adequate concentrations of mineral nutrients for metabolic processes to enable their survival and growth as free-living soil saprophytes, and in their symbiotic relationship with legumes. Essential nutrients, with a direct requirement in metabolism of rhizobia are carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, manganese, copper, zinc, molybdenum, nickel, cobalt and selenium. Boron does not seem to be required by rhizobia, but is essential for the establishment of effective legume symbioses. Nutrient constraints can affect both free-living and symbiotic forms of root nodule bacteria, but whether they do is a function of a complex series of events and interactions. Important physiological characteristics of rhizobia involved in, or affected by, their mineral nutrition include nutrient uptake, growth rate, gene regulation, nutrient storage, survival, genetic exchange and the viable non-culturable state. There is considerable variation between genera, species and strains of rhizobia in their response to nutrient deficiency. The effects of nutrient deficiencies on free-living rhizobia in the soil are poorly understood. Competition between strains of rhizobia for limiting phosphorus and iron in the rhizosphere may affect their ability to nodulate legumes. Processes in the development of some legume symbioses specifically require calcium, cobalt, copper, iron, potassium, molybdenum, nickel, phosphorus, selenium, zinc and boron. Limitations of phosphorus, calcium, iron and molybdenum in particular, can reduce legume productivity by affecting nodule development and function. The effects of nutrient deficiencies on rhizobia–legume signalling are not understood. The supply of essential inorganic nutrients to bacteroids in relation to nutrient partitioning in nodule tissues and nutrient transport to the symbiosome may affect effectiveness of nitrogen fixation. An integration of molecular approaches with more traditional biochemical, physiological and field-based studies is needed to improve understanding of the agricultural importance of rhizobia response to nutrient stress.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/ea00087

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
O'Hara, G. W.
Venue
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
Published
2001-05-18
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
417-433
ISSN
  • 0816-1089 (ISSN-L)
  • 1446-5574
OpenAlex
W1829358604
Cited by
235
References
0
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutritional constraints on root nodule bacteria affecting symbiotic nitrogen fixation: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/ea00087
The paper
O'Hara, G. W. (2001). Nutritional constraints on root nodule bacteria affecting symbiotic nitrogen fixation: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1071/ea00087

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.