The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Soil microbial biomass—what do the numbers really mean?
Abstract
Summary. Soil microbial biomass comprises less than 5% of organic matter in soil. However, it performs at least 3 critical functions in soil and the environment. It is a labile source of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur; it is an immediate sink of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur; and it is an agent of nutrient transformation and pesticide degradation. In addition, microorganisms form symbiotic associations with roots, act as biological agents against plant pathogens, contribute towards soil aggregation, and participate in soil formation. Critical evaluation of the significance of soil microbial biomass is hampered by the reliable measurement of microbial biomass, and simultaneous partitioning of its 3 major functions in soil. For comparative purposes, soil microbial biomass and its derived indices have been successfully used to measure early changes induced by land use practices, zero tillage, crop rotations and other cultural practices, nutrient cycling, land disposal of sewage sludge, and applications of herbicides and insecticides. However, as a routine analytical tool, it is limited by the cumbersome and time consuming measurements, lack of benchmarking values and interpretation, ambiguous relationship with productivity, and cost-effectiveness. With increasing demand to monitor soil quality and protection of the environment, improved and rapid techniques, including molecular biotechniques, will be required to measure soil microbial biomass for its size of sink, source and rates of turnover. Eventually, agricultural science will benefit and utilise soil microbial biomass as an analytical tool to produce abundant, economical, and clean food and fibre.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage
Liang, C., Schimel, J. P., & Jastrow, J. D. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.105 · Cited by 3,320
Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment
He, Z. L., Yang, X. E., & Stoffella, P. J. (2005) · Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtemb.2005.02.010 · Cited by 1,772
Haynes, R. J. (2005) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(04)85005-3 · Cited by 1,010
An Absorbing Markov Chain approach to understanding the microbial role in soil carbon stabilization
Liang, C., Cheng, G., Wixon, D. L., & Balser, T. C. (2011) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-010-9525-3 · Cited by 235
Abubaker, J., Cederlund, H., Arthurson, V., & Pell, M. (2013) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.07.002 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Dalal, R. C.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 649
- ISSN
- 0816-1089 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121045927
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil microbial biomass—what do the numbers really mean? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/ea97142
- The paper
- Dalal, R. C. (1998). Soil microbial biomass—what do the numbers really mean? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1071/ea97142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.