Cited by 233Photosynthetic Processes and MechanismsPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsPlant Stress Responses and Tolerance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Energy dissipation in C 3 plants under drought

Flexas, Jaume, Medrano, Hipólito·2002·Functional Plant Biology

Abstract

A general quantification of the relative contribution of different light energy dissipation processes to total dissipation under different drought conditions is lacking. Here we compare six studies, including enough data for such a general quantification, to build up a general pattern of the relative importance of several energy dissipation mechanisms in response to drought in C3 plants. Such a general pattern apparently emerges independently of specific acclimation to drought, but largely dependent on CO2 availability in the chloroplasts, which may be regulated under drought by adjustments in stomatal and mesophyll conductances. Under irrigation and saturating light, more than 50% of absorbed light is thermally dissipated, while photosynthesis dissipates 20–30% and photorespiration 10–20%. Under mild drought, the contribution of photosynthesis decreases, and that of photorespiration increases in a compensatory manner. During moderate to severe drought, the contribution of both photosynthesis and photorespiration decreases, and thermal dissipation increases up to 70–90% of the total light absorbed. The contribution of other processes, like the Mehler reaction, is shown to be very low under both irrigation and drought. Therefore, in C3 plants subjected to different degrees of drought, more than 90% of the total energy absorbed by leaves is dissipated by the sum of thermal dissipation, photorespiration and photosynthesis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/fp02015

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Flexas, J., & Medrano, H.
Affiliations
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Venue
Functional Plant Biology
Published
2002-10-18
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1209-1215
ISSN
  • 1445-4408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1445-4416
OpenAlex
W1986186103
Cited by
233
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Functional Plant Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Keywords
energy dissipation, C3 plants, drought stress, heat dissipation, photorespiration, photosynthesis, Mehler reaction, stomatal conductance, mesophyll conductance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review