The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breeding for improved water productivity in temperate cereals: phenotyping, quantitative trait loci, markers and the selection environment
Abstract
Consistent gains in grain yield in dry environments have been made by empirical breeding although there is disturbing evidence that these gains may have slowed. There are few examples where an understanding of the physiology and the genetics of putative important drought-related traits has led to improved yields. Success will first depend on identifying the most important traits in the target regions. It will then depend on accurate and fast phenotyping, which, in turn, will lead to: (1) trait-based selection being immediately transferable into breeding operations and (2) being able to identify the underlying genes or the important genomic regions (quantitative trait loci), perhaps leading to efficient marker-based selection (MBS). Genetic complexity, extent of genotype × environment (G × E) interaction and sampling cost per line will determine value of phenotyping over MBS methods. Here, we review traits of importance in dry environments and review whether molecular or phenotypic selection methods are likely to be the most effective in crop improvement programs and where the main bottlenecks to selection are. We also consider whether selection for these traits should be made in dry environments or environments where there is no soil water limitation. The development of lines/populations for trait validation studies and for varietal development is also described. We firstly conclude that despite the spectacular improvements in molecular technologies, fast and accurate phenotyping remains the major bottleneck to enhancing yield gains in water-limited environments. Secondly, for most traits of importance in dry environments, selection is generally conducted most effectively in favourable moisture environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Isotopic Composition of Plant Carbon Correlates With Water-Use Efficiency of Wheat Genotypes
Farquhar, G., & Richards, R. (1984) · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1071/pp9840539 · Cited by 2,200
Self-citationMethods of Studying Root Systems
Böhm, W. (1979) · Ecological Studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-67282-8 · Cited by 2,028
Australian journal of plant physiology
(2000) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(00)80054-0 · Cited by 1,567
Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics
Cattivelli, L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F.-W., Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A. M., Francia, E., Marè, C., Tondelli, A., & Stanca, A. M. (2008) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.004 · Cited by 1,433
Plant Productivity in the Arid and Semiarid Zones
Fischer, R. A., & Turner, N. C. (1978) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.29.060178.001425 · Cited by 804
Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J., Condon, A. G., & van Herwaarden, A. F. (2002) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2002.0111 · Cited by 727
Self-citationThe role of root architectural traits in adaptation of wheat to water-limited environments
Manschadi, A. M., Christopher, J., deVoil, P., & Hammer, G. L. (2006) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp06055 · Cited by 656
Reproductive Development in Grain Crops during Drought
Saini, H. S., & Westgate, M. E. (1999) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60843-3 · Cited by 619
Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce—from breeding to field management
Passioura, J. (2006) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.012 · Cited by 556
From mutations to MAGIC: resources for gene discovery, validation and delivery in crop plants
Cavanagh, C., Morell, M., Mackay, I., & Powell, W. (2008) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.01.002 · Cited by 501
Cited by
Genetic and genomic tools to improve drought tolerance in wheat
Fleury, D., Jefferies, S., Kuchel, H., & Langridge, P. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq152 · Cited by 549
Exploiting genetic diversity from landraces in wheat breeding for adaptation to climate change
Lopes, M. S., El-Basyoni, I., Baenziger, P. S., Singh, S., Royo, C., Ozbek, K., Aktas, H., Ozer, E., Ozdemir, F., Manickavelu, A., et al. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erv122 · Cited by 535
Kumar, A., Dixit, S., Ram, T., Yadaw, R. B., Mishra, K. K., & Mandal, N. P. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eru363 · Cited by 423
Phenotyping for drought tolerance in grain crops: when is it useful to breeders?
Passioura, J. B. (2012) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp12079 · Cited by 306
Prognosis for genetic improvement of yield potential and water-limited yield of major grain crops
Hall, A. J., & Richards, R. A. (2013) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.05.014 · Cited by 295
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J., Watt, M., Condon, A. G. (., Spielmeyer, W., & Dolferus, R.
- Venue
- Functional Plant Biology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2010-02-03
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 85-97
- ISSN
- 1445-4408 (ISSN-L)
- 1445-4416
- OpenAlex
- W2139554515
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 26.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breeding for improved water productivity in temperate cereals: phenotyping, quantitative trait loci, markers and the selection environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/fp09219
- The paper
- Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J., Watt, M., Condon, A. G. (., Spielmeyer, W., & Dolferus, R. (2010). Breeding for improved water productivity in temperate cereals: phenotyping, quantitative trait loci, markers and the selection environment. Functional Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1071/fp09219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.