The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Energy and nutrient fluxes from rivers and streams into terrestrial food webs
Abstract
Ecologists long have been aware that there is flux of energy and nutrients from riverine systems to the surrounding terrestrial landscape and vice versa. Riparian ecotones are diverse and ecologically important. Consequently, there is substantial literature examining faunal-mediated transfers of energy and nutrients from rivers into terrestrial food webs. A wide variety of taxa has been shown to utilise riparian resources, from species specialised for existence at the aquatic–terrestrial interface to opportunistic predators and scavengers. Outputs from rivers may be influenced by productivity gradients, channel geometry and the condition of the exchange surface. Until recently, consideration of faunal-transferred, allochthonous inputs has been peripheral to other research questions. The development of general models of inter-habitat transfers, together with advances in technology, has placed questions about the ecological importance of riverine outputs squarely on the research agenda. Researchers now are investigating how aquatic subsidies influence food-web dynamics at landscape scales. However, ecologists continue to largely ignore subsidisation of terrestrial food webs by energy and nutrients from floodwaters in lowland river–floodplain systems. The dearth of information about the benefits of flooding to terrestrial consumers appears to have resulted in underestimation of the gross ecological impacts of river regulation.
Verifying this paper
8 of 9 steps done · this page updates itself — you can leave and come back
- Registry recordVerified
- Full textFetching the open-access text — a few minutes for a paper we haven’t read before
- Reference listNot fetched yet
- Reference checkNot run yet for this paper
- StatisticsNeeds the full text
- ClaimsNeeds the full text
- Cited sourcesNeeds claims to check
- Self-checkNeeds the full text
- VerificationFindings verified
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems are naturally integrated through their watersheds.
“These ecosystems are naturally integrated through their watersheds”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Ballinger and Lake, 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The geochemistry of the stable carbon isotopes
Craig, H. (1953) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(53)90001-5 · Cited by 1,965
Structure and Function of Stream Ecosystems
Cummins, K. W. (1974) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1296676 · Cited by 1,413 · cited 1×
“floodplain systems (Cummins 1974; Junk et al. 1989).”
BackgroundAnadromous Fish as Keystone Species in Vertebrate Communities
Willson, M. F., & Halupka, K. C. (1995) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09030489.x · Cited by 332 · cited 1×
“Anadromous salmon are an exception because they are consumed by a variety of species not considered to be specialised for piscivory (Willson and Halupka 1995).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large herbivores and aquatic–terrestrial links in southern boreal forests
Bump, J. K., Tischler, K. B., Schrank, A. J., Peterson, R. O., & Vucetich, J. A. (2009) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01498.x · Cited by 69
Rochlin, I., James-Pirri, M.-J., Adamowicz, S. C., Wolfe, R. J., Capotosto, P., Dempsey, M. E., Iwanejko, T., & Ninivaggi, D. V. (2012) · Wetlands Ecology and Management · doi:10.1007/s11273-012-9251-9 · Cited by 24
Irrigation canals are newly created streams of semi-arid agricultural regions
Carlson, E. A., Cooper, D. J., Merritt, D. M., Kondratieff, B. C., & Waskom, R. M. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.246 · Cited by 25
Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool
Tessier, D. L., Maranger, R., & Poisot, T. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.02.03.932095 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Ballinger, A., & Lake, P. S.
- Affiliations
- ACRC for Freshwater Ecology, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
- Venue
- Marine and Freshwater Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2006-01-17
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-28
- ISSN
- 1323-1650
- 1448-6059
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review