The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The importance of research and public opinion to conservation management of sharks and rays: a synthesis
Open accessAbstract
Growing concern for the world’s shark and ray populations is driving the need for greater research to inform conservation management. A change in public perception, from one that we need to protect humans from sharks to one where we must protect sharks from humans, has added to calls for better management. The present paper examines the growing need for research for conservation management of sharks and rays by synthesising information presented in this Special Issue from the 2010 Sharks International Conference and by identifying future research needs, including topics such as taxonomy, life history, population status, spatial ecology, environmental effects, ecosystem role and human impacts. However, this biological and ecological research agenda will not be sufficient to fully secure conservation management. There is also a need for research to inform social and economic sustainability. Effective conservation management will be achieved by setting clear priorities for research with the aid of stakeholders, implementing well designed research projects, building the capacity for research, and clearly communicating the results to stakeholders. If this can be achieved, it will assure a future for this iconic group, the ecosystems in which they occur and the human communities that rely on them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries
Pauly, D. (1995) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89171-5 · Cited by 2,517
Stevens, J. (2000) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.0724 · Cited by 1,722
Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines
Heithaus, M. R., Frid, A., Wirsing, A. J., & Worm, B. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.003 · Cited by 1,349
Springer, V. G., Last, P. R., & Stevens, J. D. (1994) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1446735 · Cited by 1,167
Standardized diet compositions and trophic levels of sharks
CORTES, E. (1999) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1006/jmsc.1999.0489 · Cited by 968
Cascading top-down effects of changing oceanic predator abundances
Baum, J. K., & Worm, B. (2009) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01531.x · Cited by 932
Dulvy, N. K., Baum, J. K., Clarke, S., Compagno, L. J. V., Cortés, E., Domingo, A., Fordham, S., Fowler, S., Francis, M. P., Gibson, C., et al. (2008) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.975 · Cited by 785
Self-citationTransoceanic Migration, Spatial Dynamics, and Population Linkages of White Sharks
Bonfil, R., Meÿer, M., Scholl, M. C., Johnson, R., O'Brien, S., Oosthuizen, H., Swanson, S., Kotze, D., & Paterson, M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1114898 · Cited by 488
The South African Journal of Science
(1964) · Nature · doi:10.1038/201136f0 · Cited by 452
Sensory biology of sharks, skates, and rays / editors Edward S. Hodgson, Robert F. Mathewson.
Hodgson, E. S., Mathewson, R. F., (U.S.)., N. R. L., & States., U. (1978) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.3596 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Simpfendorfer, C. A., Heupel, M. R., White, W. T., & Dulvy, N. K.
- Venue
- Marine and Freshwater Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2011-06-24
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 518-527
- ISSN
- 1323-1650 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-6059
- OpenAlex
- W2136069762
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 12.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The importance of research and public opinion to conservation management of sharks and rays: a synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/mf11086
- The paper
- Simpfendorfer, C. A., Heupel, M. R., White, W. T., & Dulvy, N. K. (2011). The importance of research and public opinion to conservation management of sharks and rays: a synthesis. Marine and Freshwater Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf11086
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.