The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamics of two populations of the humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae (Borowski)
Abstract
Results of studies of the structure and dynamics of two humpback whale stocks of the southern hemisphere (group IV, 70º E.-130°E.; group V, 130º E.-170º W.) are drawn together. Estimates are made of recruitment and mortality rates, and an assessment is made of the yields to be taken from these stocks under various conditions. The two stocks are shown to be, in the main, independent of one another although there is a negligible sporadic exchange between them. The group V stock is shown to fragment, but probably randomly, in its northern migration. Reproduction, nutrition, and growth are described. Birth rate of females is estimated to be 0.186, and since the sex ratio is approximately 1, the total birth rate is about 0.37. Parameters (von Bertalanffy) for growth are L∞ 42.58 ft for males, 45.21 ft for females; k(male) = 0.266, k(female): = 0.205. The history of exploitation is reported. Population structure is described from evidence drawn from examination of commercial catches; substantial changes in recent years (reduction of the numbers in older groups) are described. Measurement of effort, and an analysis of variations in selectivity of the killings are reported in detail. Decline in the abundance of these groups, group IV steadily since 1954 and group V sharply since 1959, is described. Total mortality, natural mortality, fishing mortality, and recruitment rates are estimated and are used in estimating stock numbers and sustainable yields. The group IV stock probably consisted of 12,000-17,000 individuals in its unfished state, of about 10,000 individuals in 1949, and no more than 800 in 1962. The group V stock probably contained about 10,000 individuals in its unfished state, but only 500 or less in 1962. In its present state, group IV could give a sustainable yield of 18 (range 4-32) whales, and group V of 12 (range 3-21) whales. The maximum yields these stocks could sustain in completely regenerated state are: group IV, 390 whales per year; group V, 330 whales per year. Group IV would require 28-49 years to reach that state, group V would require 36-63 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The social and reproductive biology of Humpback Whales: an ecological perspective
CLAPHAM, P. J. (1996) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.1996.tb00145.x · Cited by 286
Interactions between singing Hawaiian humpback whales and conspecifics nearby
Tyack, P. (1981) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00300822 · Cited by 286
Stakeholder engagement in the governance of marine migratory species: barriers and building blocks
Miller, R., Marsh, H., Benham, C., & Hamann, M. (2020) · Endangered Species Research · doi:10.3354/esr01049 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Chittleborough, R.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1965-03-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-128
- ISSN
- 0067-1940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050706974
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of two populations of the humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae (Borowski). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/mf9650033
- The paper
- Chittleborough, R. (1965). Dynamics of two populations of the humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae (Borowski). Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf9650033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.